Answer: Cohort Analysis report
Explanation:
Cohort is defined as the collection of people who persist related or common characteristic. Cohort analysis report is the record that is made from the cohort behavior over certain period of time.
Analysis and comparison of different behavior is done in this report to determine the state of performance i.e.-high performance,low performance or moderate performance. Analytic dimensions are used in this record making such as Acquisition date etc.
Answer: Option C
Explanation: Marketing uses inseparability to describe the main service value as distinct from goods. Inseparability is the feature of a service that makes it difficult to distinguish the service's supply or output from its utilization.
In the given case, the main objective of the consumer was to get her product but the service by the employee was also an inseparable part that affected the utility satisfaction of Wendy.
Hence we can conclude that the correct option is C.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
