Answer:
power elite theory
Explanation:
The answer is "power elite theory".
The power elite theory or the elite theory in sociology describes that a small group of wealthy and elite people have the most power in the society. They are the policy makers of the society. They proved themselves to be the most powerful people in the society leaving the common masses of the society with no power or very little decision making power.
These small group of wealthy and bold [people become the elite people of the society in whose hands most power lies.
Thus the answer is --
power elite theory
It is possible that the child, which is Donald, is suffering from Dyslexia.
Dyslexia is a case wherein a person has trouble matching the letters that they see including the sounds that those letters and the combinations it makes. Dyslexia does not choose age. It can be suffered by an adult or a child. But, we must take note that Dyslexia has no connection to the overall intelligence of an individual dyslexic person. Yes, they have difficulty in reading but they have the intelligence to be a much better reader.
Answer: Little is known of the pharaohs (rulers) of the early dynasties. The Egyptian word "pharaoh" literally means "great house." Pharaohs were more than just rulers. They were considered gods and were believed to possess the secrets of heaven and earth.
Explanation:
Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.
Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :
- The Bandwagon Fallacy: Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
- The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
- The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
- The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
- The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
- The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.
To learn more logical fallacies refer
brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ4
