<em>Which statement best summarizes the evolution of the Supreme Court's</em>
<em>interpretation of free speech during the 20th century?</em>
<u><em>A. Over time, the Supreme Court became less likely to allow restrictions on free speech.</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em>~Hope this answers your question!~</em></u>
I would consider them hypocrites because they were fighting for their religion, but they did not adhere to the religion themselves. One of the major rules of this religion was not to kill and yet they did.
Signed aggreements of trade
Answer:
The practice of female infanticide.
Explanation:
Some countries, especially China, India, have practiced female infanticide due to the fact that they regard males as superior. As for China an addition factor might have been the one child rule applied for a long time although this law has been relaxed in the last few years and you can now have 2 children. Also, India is well know for female infanticide and women are less valued and the fetus is aborted.
______________________________________________
https://www.economist.com/international/2017/01/21/the-war-on-baby-girls-winds-down
India has cause to fret. According to two demographers, John Bongaarts and Christophe Guilmoto, a staggering 45m girls and women are missing from the country. Some were never born, having been detected by ultrasound scans and aborted. Others died young as a result of being neglected more than boys. Some villages in the north have an alarming surplus of boys and young men. Yet attitudes and behaviour are changing. In India, and in the world as a whole, the war on baby girls seems to be winding down.
Answer:
Australia pull factors:
-job income
-job opportunites
-lots of space
-better life/cleaner air
-friends and family
Australia push factors:
-extreme weather/ natural disasters
-communal violence
-racism
-dangerous animals
