In this example, Kiwanuka is suing for intentional infliction of emotional distress. This can be defined as extreme and outrageous conduct which results in severe emotional distress to another person. This act must be severely extreme, to an extent that is not normally tolerated by society. In such cases, threatening conduct coupled with repeated annoyances can be enough to offer support to a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.
If I were the judge, I would rule in favor of Kiwanuka, as I the fact that Bakilana held Kiwanuka in isolation and confiscated her passport is evidence of extreme emotional distress.
Answer:
monopolist
Explanation:
Monopolistic competition is a kind of imperfect competition in which specific person or enterprise is the only supplier of a particular commodity.
A monopolist is not very much concerned about the product as customers have no alternatives but to buy that product.
Also, he can change the price or quantity of the product as in an industry he is a single seller .
In the given question, it's given that There is often only one provider of cable television services in each region of the country: Time Warner is in New York, Comcast is in most of New England, and so forth.
So, it would have caused Comcast to become an overly large <u>monopolist</u> with too much power if it buys Time Warner.
Answer:
Im thinking it is the FBI
Explanation: MY guess would point to the FBI bc they are the ones who come in on cyber related crimes. so i would say A is the correct answer
The Pawnshop would be the highest risk for the customer.