Answer:
$6.
Explanation:
Holding stock of a Public company entitles you to a potential return on your investment which can be in the form of Capital Appreciation/Gain, that is buying at low and selling at high, or Dividends received. In the given question, we are not required to calculate total return rather capital gain, simply the difference between purchase price and selling price, so there is no need to account for dividends. The formula for Capital Gain is given below:
Capital Gain / Appreciation = Selling Price - Purchase Price
⇒ Capital Gain = 38 - 32 = $6.
Answer:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Explanation:
The entity that would be involved in this case is the the EEOC. That is the equal employment opportunity commission. The violation that has occurred here is that both the man and the woman are equally qualified for this job but the owner wants to pay the woman a smaller salary compared to what he wants to pay the man. The EEOC handles such matters of discrimination to employees and workers based on gender, race, religion etc.
Answer:
4. to gain access to low-cost inputs of production
Explanation:
The reason for Exxon Mobil to opt for this strategic alliance, Whereas the remaining ones are not relevant in this context may be because it can help to gain access to low-cost inputs of production.
Answer:
The correct answers that fills the gaps are: discovery, litigation, negotiated settlement, examine, evidence.
Explanation:
The litigation is a conflict of interest qualified and elevated to a jurisdictional authority, by a subject of law, with an intention or claim against another that manifests a resistance or that opposes the approach of the former, as Francisco Carnal suggests.
Some authors consider that the concept of litigation only applies to civil proceedings in contractual disputes, and that the term controversy should be used in criminal proceedings. However, progress has been made regarding this idea, because now, in criminal proceedings, civil action or damages are usually used, which gives rise to extra contractual liability.
The case was appealed to the superior court which is the highest court in jurisdiction.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In common law system, a superior court is a court of general capability which commonly has boundless ward as to deal with the common and criminal legitimate cases.
The superior court can deal with the criminal and the common civil cases in which they have no boundations since they have the highest jurisdiction in the order so there is no limitation.
