Answer:
Social relation
The primary goal of this paper is to summarise current evidence on social relations and health, specifically how social integration and social support are related to health behaviours and health outcomes, using results from published reviews. Our analysis revealed that social relations are beneficial for health behaviours such as chronic illness self‐management and decreased suicidal tendency. The salutary effects of general measures of social relations (e.g. being validated, being cared for, etc.) on health behaviours (e.g. healthy diet, physical activity, smoking, alcohol abuse) are weaker, but specific measures of social relations targeting corresponding health behaviours are more predictive. There is growing evidence that social relations are predictive of mortality and cardiovascular disease, and social relations play an equally protective role against both the incidence and progression of cardiovascular disease. On the other hand, evidence was mixed for the association between social relations and cancer.
Social Relations, Health , and Health Outcomes: A Survey and Synthesis
Louis Tay, Kenneth Tan, Ed , Elizabeth Gonzalez
Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being 1 (5), 28-78, 2013
The primary goal of this paper is to summarise current evidence on social relations and health, specifically how social integration and social support are related to health and health outcomes, using results from published reviews. Our analysis revealed that social relations are beneficial for health such as chronic illness self‐management and decreased suicidal tendency. The salutary effects of general
The answer is: To make sure business is conducted safely and fairly
Business is created to obtain profit. Often times, safety precautions and fairplay that corporations need to take to protect the consumers would reduce the amount of profit that they can obtain. This cause many of the corporations started to overlook the safety precaution.
Because of this, government creates regulations in order to protect the consumers and ensure the corporations do not cheat each other.
Answer:
overturn the punitive damage award as grossly excessive.
Explanation:
If the court heard the case, it would likely overturn the punitive damage award as grossly excessive.
This is because, since or if it has been established to be an accident and not intentional, and Mellisa has being fined of $5000 for damages, the $50miliom is unreasonable or too much to pay as the punitive damages. Hence, it will be assumed that the previous jury or verdict violates a sense of justice.
You have to watch the video in order to answer the question right I haven't seen the video but if you could give me the link I could Help you answer your question.