The final answer for this question would be.....
8.8n^2+16n+0.1
Hope this helps!!!!
First, find the total area of pizza. The area of a rectangle is length times width.
Area = 21 x 36 = 756 sq. inches
Now, we must divide the total area with the largest square possible without any excess. So, we equate the area of the pizza to area of square:
A = s² = 756
s = 6 √21
Hence, the largest piece square possible has a side of 6 inches. Then, we divide the total area of the pizza by the area of each square piece to find the number of pieces;
756/6² = 21
Thus, there would be 21 pieces of 6-in square piece of pizza.
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
Since they are not parallel nor the same line, they have 1 intersecting point, which is the solution.
If they were parallel, they would have no solution.
If they were the same line, they would have infinite solutions.
Scientists need technology to figure out other stuff. For example, A computer is used to research.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
In the model
Log (salary) = B0 + B1LSAT +B2GPA +B3log(libvol) +B4log(cost)+B5 rank+u
The hypothesis that rank has no effect on log (salary) is H0:B5 = 0. The estimated equation (now with standard errors) is
Log (salary) = 8.34 + .0047 LSAT + .248 GPA + .095 log(libvol)
(0.53) (.0040) (.090) (.033)
+ .038 log(cost) – .0033 rank
(.032) (.0003)
n = 136, R2 = .842.
The t statistic on rank is –11(i.e. 0.0033/0.0003), which is very significant. If rank decreases by 10 (which is a move up for a law school), median starting salary is predicted to increase by about 3.3%.
(ii) LSAT is not statistically significant (t statistic ≈1.18) but GPA is very significance (t statistic ≈2.76). The test for joint significance is moot given that GPA is so significant, but for completeness the F statistic is about 9.95 (with 2 and 130 df) and p-value ≈.0001.