Answer:
The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.
Explanation:
The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers. This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions. The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage. With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.
Answer:
Because each state and city is different. Different laws need to be applied to each.
Explanation:
Answer: Ask the Staff
Explanation: You see the moderators on this site will probably give you a far more in depth look at refund policy.
Answer: Allowing a child to interpret in an emergency.
Explanation: I found the answer on Quizlet. :)
