1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
elixir [45]
3 years ago
9

Why is Double Jeopardy important to Americans?

Law
1 answer:
lianna [129]3 years ago
4 0
Double Jeopardy is important to American because Double jeopardy recognizes the strain one criminal trial can cause, and prevents further prosecutions for the same offenses.
You might be interested in
As you approach any intersection, you should be prepared to avoid colliding with
Wewaii [24]

Answer:

Pedestrians and Bicyclists coming from any direction.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select Yes if the item describes a society that functions under the rule of law.
svetoff [14.1K]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

I don't think I have any explanation

5 0
3 years ago
- Write a paragraph summarizing a landmark Supreme Court case. What impact did it
almond37 [142]

Answer:

Landmark cases are those that have had a long-term impact on how a law is applied, often involving your personal rights and liberties. A landmark case is a court case that has been researched for its historical and legal significance because it is significant to the country's history. Importance: The Brown decision is heralded as a landmark decision in Supreme Court history, overturning Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) which had created the "separate but equal" doctrine.

8 0
2 years ago
The graph of the function, ƒ, is shown. What is ƒ(0)? A) ƒ(0) = −2 B) ƒ(0) = −1 C) ƒ(0) = 0 D) ƒ(0) = 2
never [62]

Answer:

12 only... x=0 y=12 f(0)=12

8 0
3 years ago
What is the prosecutor’s burden of proof in a criminal case?.
ladessa [460]

Answer:

The party that does not have the burden of proof is assumed to be correct until the burden is met. after then, it shifts to the opposite party.

The burden of proof is on the Prosecutor for criminal cases, which makes the defendant believed to be innocent.

When the prosecution holds the burden of proof. They must prove all defenses (not including affirmative defenses) in which the proof of non-existence of all affirmative defense(s), isn't constitutionally required of the prosecution.

I hope this makes sense and I understood the question right.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to conflict theorists, societal conflict promotes crime by
    10·1 answer
  • One of the mistakes that was made in both the JonBenet Ramsey and Lizzie Borden cases was:
    5·1 answer
  • Is it illegal to destroy other people's mail?
    6·2 answers
  • Place these events in chronological order:
    15·2 answers
  • Feels like we're on the edge right now
    12·2 answers
  • What is the U.S. Supreme Court's ultimate decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube and how does it address the issue of separatio
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be circumstantial evidence that the defendant was at the scene of the crime?
    8·2 answers
  • What type of law regulates government bureaucracies?
    6·2 answers
  • Law books and articles that summarize, systematize, compile, explain, and interpret the law are called
    13·1 answer
  • Which amendment to the U.S. Constitution grants the right to a jury trial in state criminal proceedings
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!