I believe B as they have a right to testy if they want to but the lawyer just shut him down in fear of losing the case so it could be either unethical or illegal
In my opinion that's true, the person in power manipulate the criminal justice system to protect their and related interests and ignore the plight of the poor and lower class. The justice system is based on the idea that the rich and the poor are treated equally. The poor are treated worse than the rich. Poor people stay in jail before the trial because they can't afford bail, which leads to a higher sentencing rate.
- I don't think so the person in power could establish a new form of government because the power is divided equally in democracy but this could happen in monarchy though.
Hope it helps!
Answer:
Arizona v. Gant
Explanation:
Arizona v. Gant (2009), was a USA Supreme Court choice stating that the 4th Amendment to the USA Constitution requires law implementation officials to exhibit a real and proceeding with danger to their wellbeing presented by an arrestee, or a need to protect proof identified with the wrongdoing of capture from altering by the arrestee, so as to legitimize a warrantless vehicular pursuit episode to capture directed after the vehicle's ongoing tenants have been captured and made sure about.
English please lol I don’t understand
