Answer:
the answer is B. hope i could help yall :)
Answer: The unintended, undesirable effect is morally tolerable if it brings a good result.
Explanation: The doctrine (or principle) of double effect is often invoked to explain the permissibility of an action that causes a serious harm.
According to the principle of double effect, sometimes it is permissible to cause a harm as a side effect (or “double effect”) of bringing about a good result even though it would not be permissible to cause such a harm as a means to bringing about the same good end.
13 - 5 = 8 (eight classical music discs were bought.)
As
of now, the government is doing an enough job to ensure that human rights are
being protected through providing basic human rights such as food, water, and
shelter. Though this is the case, we cannot deny the fact that there should be
progress in terms of the different possibilities that the government may offer
in order to address the current problems available right now. These human
rights are being addressed, but of course, there should always be progress.
I think the answer is true, but I'm not really sure
