The colonists<span> expressed their </span>dissatisfaction<span> with their treatment by King George and cited this treatment as a reason for them to govern themselves, therefore declaring their </span>independence<span> from Great </span>Britain. Long before the first shot was fired, the American Revolution began as a series of written complaints to colonial governors and representatives in England over the rights of the colonists.
In fact, a list of grievances comprises the longest section of the Declaration of Independence. The organization of the Declaration of Independence reflects what has come to be known as the classic structure of argument—that is, an organizational model for laying out the premises and the supporting evidence, the contexts and the claims for argument.
According to its principal author, Thomas Jefferson, the Declaration was intended to be a model of political argument. On its 50th anniversary, Jefferson wrote that the object of the Declaration was “[n]ot to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of, not merely to say things which had never been said before; but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent, and to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take.”
This second part comes from THE ARGUMENT OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE at EDSITEMENT!
“Principles of mercantilism are that the government must encourage exports that will bring in more gold or silver and discourage imports.
Also, manufacturers should be the choice for exports because increased value from labor and monopoly will occur.”
Answer:
They said there was no law against it, and explained how they were needed to help the economy.
Explanation:
Answer: its A on edge.
Explanation:
The emperors viewed the Church as an adversary.
In South Carolina v. Katzenbach ( and similarly and much more recently, in 2013, in Shelby County v. Holder) South Carolina filed a complaint with the Supreme Court challenging the Voting Rights Act as unconstitutionalon respect to state´s rights. Many outhern states follow suit. This provoked the Supreme Court to pass judgement before the elections of 1966, upholding the Voting Rights Act and thus enabling almost a million of African Americans to register to vote.