Answer: FALSE!
Explanation: Did the same test online and got it right.
The correct answer is "In both poems, the final stanza sums up the poem's meaning."
In "Pears", the first stanza describes how the speaker's aunties have swelled at the waist and resemble pears, but this swelling is due to the goodness of their lives, making a refuge for a child. Thus, in the second stanza we are told that the sweetest people the speaker knows are those who resemble pears, because of what he or she explained in the first stanza.
In "Hunger", stanzas from 1 to 3 describe the feeling of hunger and how to "cure it" with lots of food. In stanza number 4, the speaker is not feeling good after she or he ate a lot. Finally, the last stanza is the one that sums the poem meaning, telling us that hunger is suppressed by eating (stanzas 1-3) but do not eat too much or you will feel sick (stanza 4), thus summing up the meaning of the whole poem.
Answer:
to show the fight for independence is a spirtual stuggle
Explanation:
i think so
This is a tricky question, especially because we are not offered a context for the sentences. But, in my interpretation, the best option would be a colon.
A semicolon connects independent sentences - it has other uses, this is just one of them. That means that, in this case, both sentences should present a complete meaning in themselves. One should not need the other to make sense. However, the first sentence, on its own, is a bit lacking, especially because we do not have an object completing the verb "beat" at the end.
A colon introduces a sentence that is explaining, adding meaning, to the one before it. That seems to be what happens in this case. Why would no lunch beat? Because we had the best pizza in the whole world. The meaning of the first sentence is now complete.
Answer:
The boy's bedroom is 7 meters wide
Explanation:
it doesn't make sense for a bedroom to be as small as 7cm wide or as large as 7km wide
