The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
Answer:
Overlapping
Explanation:
Jacob Kounin is an educational theorist born on January 17, 1912 who focused on a teacher's ability to affect student behavior through instructional management. According to my research on , I can say that based on the information provided within the question Kounin would say this is an example of Overlapping. This is defined as is attending to two or more events at the same time.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
I believe it is B because for a monopoly it has no close substitute and is protected by a barrier that prevents other firms from selling that good or service
The answer is B! They would be hanged as traitors.
Answer:
There are no terms underlined.
Explanation:
If you tell me the underlined term i might be able to help.
