Answer:
B!!!!!
Explanation:
The Court most recently cited Terry v. Ohio in Arizona v. Johnson. In that 2009 case, the Court ruled 9–0 in favor of further expanding Terry, granting police the ability to frisk an individual in a stopped vehicle if there is reasonable suspicion to believe the individual is armed and dangerous.
Answer:
Guns carried in public pose a danger to public safety, and lax concealed carry laws increase the risk of violent confrontations.
Background
The carrying of concealed, loaded guns in public places can quickly escalate everyday conflicts into deadly altercations, causing tragic, irreversible damage to innocent lives. These dangers are amplified when the permitting standards for concealed carry are weakened. Despite this public safety risk, the gun lobby continues to push dangerous proposals that would weaken or eliminate the permitting requirements for carrying concealed firearms in public.
It is ok to assume that, as SOME might be ordering things (firearms are legit sold at an online store, not mentioning it bc yeah) or watching… things… on the internet. For example, someone made a video of ordering illegal items online. Don’t worry, they returned it. I think. If not, this would be a better example.
Answer:
Those circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that entry (or other relevant prompt action) was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of a suspect, or some other consequence improperly frustrating legitimate law
hope it helps you
