1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VLD [36.1K]
3 years ago
7

The U.S governmwnt is considered a federal system because

History
1 answer:
zavuch27 [327]3 years ago
3 0
D would be your answer
You might be interested in
Fast please<br> How did the Cold War effect us today?
Brut [27]

Answer:

The cold war effect us today//

Explanation:

World War II led to the massive mobilisation of all the people and resources nations could bring to bear. This was total war on a global scale, producing a new sense among nations that their fates were interconnected. New technologies of war, such as heavy bombers and long-range missiles like the V-2 rocket, reduced distances of time and space. In recognition of this new state of affairs, in 1942 the US Army chief of staff, George Marshall, sent identical 50-inch, 750-pound globes to British prime minister Winston Churchill and US president Franklin Delano Roosevelt as Christmas presents.

The sheer scale of the war and the complex administrative and strategic systems required to manage these global operations led to, during the Cold War that followed, a growing interdependency of a network of institutions, attitudes and ways of working.

Fuelled by the development of satellites and intercontinental nuclear missiles that further shrank the size of the planet, the Cold War redrew geopolitical notions of time, space and scale. Huge nuclear arsenals made it necessary to consider both the instantaneous and the endless: the decisive moment when mutually assured destruction is potentially set in motion, the frozen stalemate of the superpower stand-off, and the long catastrophe of a post-nuclear future.

The power of an individual decision was now outrageously amplified – the finger on the nuclear button – yet, at the same time, radically diminished in the face of unfathomable forces, in which human agency seemed to have been ceded to computers and weapons systems. The world had become too complex and too dangerous: systems were at once the threat and the solution.

It’s all about planning. x-ray_delta_one, CC BY-SA

The response

During the second half of the 20th century, many fields of enquiry from anthropology, political theory and analytical philosophy to art, music and literature were influenced by the explosion in interdisciplinary thinking that emerged from developments in cybernetics and its relationship with Cold War military research and development.

The practice of engaging with the connections and interactions between disparate elements of a problem or entity conceived as a system, and between such systems, is now commonplace in areas such as corporate strategy, town planning and environmental policy.

The pervasiveness of a systems approach also influenced the arts. The so-called systems novel, associated with writers such as Thomas Pynchon, Don DeLillo and David Foster Wallace, attempts to grasp the complex interconnectedness of society, and often the effects of technology and progress upon it. Through the 1960s and 1970s, in the radical architecture and design of the likes of Buckminster Fuller or the Archigram group, through minimalist and electronic music, and in conceptual art and emergent electronic media, the possibilities and implications of an increasingly computerised, information-driven society began to determine the form and content of cultural work.

Systems thinking offered a means of conceptualising and understanding a world that had grown hugely more complex and dangerous. Nuclear weapons demanded radical new ways of thinking about time, scale, power, death, responsibility and, most of all, control – control of technology, people, information and ideas.

The present

We are now accustomed to thinking about the current moment in global terms – globalisation, global warming, global communications, global security. Mobile phones and laptops connect us to a vast global network so we can upload and download data – data that promises to broaden our connections even as it flattens our identity into a trickle of binary code to be tracked, traded, sorted and stored.

Everyday life is firewalled and password-protected. We move under a canopy of invisible cameras and sensors, where our personal details and likenesses, our associations, preferences and transactions lie waiting to be called upon – by friends, strangers, employers or snoops. And so what? We all do it – we are already conscripted. We have already become agents, checking up on people by rifling through social media accounts or poking around on Street View.

Faced with the unfathomable complexity of world events, or climate science, or the effects of the technology that delivers updates on such matters to us in an instant, information is both the source of our dilemma and a refuge from it.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Points)
muminat

Answer:

They made Rome the dominant power in the Mediterranean is the correct answer.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I can't figure this out
Alex73 [517]
The French and Indian War also had lasting (and devastating) effects for the Native American tribes of North America. ... Furthermore, with the French presence gone, there was little to distract the British government from focusing its stifling attention on whatever Native American tribes lay within its grasp
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The morning after the 2000 presidential election, __________.
dolphi86 [110]
Neither candidates had 270 needed electoral votes. This was becuase of the recounts taking place in south florida. So, the answer is A.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the purpose of the establishment clause?
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

The First Amendment's Establishment Clause prohibits the government from making any law “respecting an establishment of religion.” This clause not only forbids the government from establishing an official religion, but also prohibits government actions that unduly favor one religion over another.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A native or inhabitant of Europe ?
    10·1 answer
  • Conservatives are often considered to be the “left” of the political spectrum, while liberals are considered to be “right” of th
    15·2 answers
  • What word for a white southerner means scoundrel or rascal
    6·1 answer
  • What are some pros and cons of the two theories represented in this activity regarding the peopling of the Americas?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is FALSE?
    15·2 answers
  • The transfer of the heat by the direct contact of particles of matter isa.pressure
    5·1 answer
  • What goods were sent from Mexico City to New Mexico?
    10·1 answer
  • When historians describe how the American European, and african commodity markets were all connected and dependent on one anothe
    15·1 answer
  • 30 pt + brainlist
    5·2 answers
  • Explain one way in which the Sufis contributed to the success of Islam in the period c. 1200 – 1450.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!