Part of the debate over rights in the 18th century involved the prerogative of kings to remove and appoint judges upon their ascension to the throne. Liberal thinkers believed that lifetime appointments would scale back the power of the king, and therefore represented social progress. If a judge was sure of his seat, he could vote according to his own judgment, despite the wishes of the king. The Whigs in Britain actually won this right, though whether it really served their cause or their government is anyone's guess.
/~\ The correct answer is:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<u>B. The spread of Islam throughout West Africa.</u>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I hope this helps! /~\
It should be A. a secondary source
This is because biographies are texts in which someone writes about someone else's life
Since the writer didn't experience it firsthand it makes it a secondary source
Answer:
He wanted to avoid a large enemy in order to further pursue his movement.
Explanation:
If Hitler can make peace with one of the largest armies in all the world and not have it interfere with his armies, then why wouldn't he? They didnt agree to be friends. Hitler later betrayed Stalin anyways, so he had mostly likely planned it for when his armies took more land and had more production going.