The mission words are <em>...unless you put that personality </em><u><em>in a believable and significant social context.</em></u>
<u></u>
<h3>Full Quote</h3>
You can't say anything meaningful about the mystery of personality unless you put that personality in a believable and significant social context.
<h3>O'Connor's Idea about Characterization</h3>
In the "<em>Purple Elephant Theory of Literature"</em> for instance, O'Connor strives to show that people are like purple elephants...that is unique. Because, humans are social in nature, the social context of a character is very critical.
Learn more about Flannery O'Connor's works at the link below:
brainly.com/question/11325034
Answer:
Figure it out. Its not that hard kid.
Explanation:
The authors of “Sugar Changed the World”, the couple Marc Aronson and Marina Budhos, want to claim with this passage how different the views on slavery were for French inhabitants and for the inhabitants in the colonies and how the change in view came about.
Answer: The judges' freeing of Pauline would have a significant effect on how people viewed involuntary servitude.
The first one does NOT have an action. So it would be an adjective.
Answer:
Power can corrupt when someone is looking for power and when they start liking it, so they will go out and try to think they are better than other people.
Explanation:
The balance of power between the characters changed because when the man was stuck in the well the children thought they had more power over the man in the beginning of the story, but at the end of the story, the man in the well gained more power over over the children when he was making them scared because he knew their names which frightened them.
