What is the difference between a fracture zone and transform fault? A transform fault is a crack, but a fracture zone is a hole
in the crust A transform fault is perpendicular to the mid-ocean ridge, but a fracture zone is not. They are two names for the same feature, a break in the plate formed by a slip at a transform plate boundary A transform fault has strike-slip motion in reverse of the direction that the plates move apart at the mid-ocean ridge, but a fracture zone has the opposite sense of motion. A transform has an active fault, separating two plates, whereas a fracture zone is just the “scar” formed on one plate by the transform fault
The difference between a racture zone and transform fault Is: transform has an active fault, separating two plates, whereas a fracture zone is just the “scar” formed on one plate by the transform fault
Explanation:
All right to understand this answer we need to remember what is a fracture zone and a transform fault.
All right, first of all, Fracture zones are oceanic linear structures that are produced by platonic plaques movement. So when they move and provoke a terrain change they can be created. They can be tectonic active and preserve a crest in the edges.
Transform faults are terrain boundaries of tectonic plaques with horizontal motion, they are also connected to another transform fault and in many cases, they picture zig-zag scenarios in the bottom of the ocean.
A "transform fault" is a fault line where two tectonic plates slide against each-other. Not all faults are transform faults. Some plates separate and allow magma to seep up and like a scab, creating new ground (these are called divergent faults.) Other faults, such as convergentfaults, occur when two plates smush into each-other and one is forced below the other where it heats up and is eventually destroyed. And the fracture zone is thus the junction between oceanic crustal regions of different ages.
