Answer:
Helen is using <em>personal appeal</em>.
Explanation:
<u>Personal appeal</u><u> is an influence tactic used by one individual to persuade another individual to take or not to take a certain action, in particular. </u>
Here, Helen is <em>appealing</em> to a personal fact, which bonds JP and Helen. By saying that they are friends since the first grade, Helen hopes to persuade JP into deciding that their friendship is more important than the act of theft. Perhaps, even that they might stop being friends if JP reports on her.
A personal appeal can be a very effective influence tactic if used smartly.
Answer:
1. 1. yz2. -4. 1
Explanation:
this is hard you are the best
<u>Answer:
</u>
The statement can be evaluated by saying that a large lead that was to be chased by the third team before the game ended made them play more and caused a large margin. Here, the association is not causation.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The examination of the statistics done by someone who seems to be one of the players is incorrect.
- It is so because though there is an apparent correlation between two different variables of the study, it has no role to play in the result of the study.
- The lead margin secured by the third team and the overall lead of the teams that played under one coach cannot be said to have influenced each other.
Answer:
Mainly to invest in to attract qualified resource human from differentes countries.
Explanation:For human resource
Answer: desire and ignorance lie at the root of suffering. By desire, Buddhists refer to craving pleasure, material goods, and immortality, all of which are wants that can never be satisfied. As a result, desiring then can only bring suffering.
Hope this helped!