Answer:
No, it definitely was not pure racism.
Explanation:
While individuals who have pure hatred and racist views against other groups of people have always existed, during the centuries that slavery existed, not everyone who owned slaves or supported slavery justified their position on the basis of racist arguments.
Very often, these arguments in favor of racism were made from an economic point of view. They justified slavery because slavery was fundamental for their economic well-being. Some people even justified slavery under supposedly moral, ethical, or religious reasons, arguing that slaves were better off under the control of their owners, or that some religious scripture justified slavery.
In "What Made Me Do What I Did", Kaneko Fumiko is a socially cognizant individual that doesn't generally have confidence in development in light of purge words, and endeavors to discover significance in life through whatever it is that she chooses to do as opposed to the aftereffect of what she does. All through the story, she runs from being sad with an antagonistic point of view and society to turning into an exceptionally energetic individual, in spite of the fact that without a genuine objective. She never had a decent association with her folks who surrendered and later repudiated her. The aftereffect of her association with her folks drove her to have her skeptical and communist convictions. The dropping out of her sentimental association with Segawa was what prompted her to wind up more free in the wake of understanding that he was not genuine of the relationship nor a capable individual. Meeting Hyeon made her more impassive about being isolated from individuals after he cleared out her in a circuitous manner. Her association with Hatsuyo, which was depicted as the nearest she had been to another lady, made her more determined and energetic about her perspectives on society. It is additionally what persuaded that it was smarter to discover importance in what she does instead of the outcomes. Meeting Pak Yeol was the start she expected to at last understand her objective of beginning her own development for the advantage of the abused and what made her a rebel.
Answer:The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a Justice, thus the President may nominate any individual to serve on the Court. Senate cloture rules historically required a two-thirds affirmative vote to advance nominations to a vote; this was changed to a three-fifths supermajority in 1975.
Explanation:
A) is the correct answer! A copy of the Constitution :) I hope this helps
