Answer:
inform the reader about the cruelty of slavery.
Explanation:
hope i helped♂
The conclusion is that in the end the park will be built even tough it is not in everybody's agenda. Some people, following Samara's proposal, are convinced of the benefits that the park would bring and work towards its construction, trying to share their point of view with other members of the community. The fact is that no one is actually against the park, parties who do not explicitly support it are just indiferent.
Therefore, there will be no opposition but only preassure made by park supporters so it will be built.
Answer:
B). "He found that children and adults who have read stories their whole lives were more likely to correctly identify the feelings and thoughts of others than those who do not read regularly."
C). "Trying to understand these characters exercises the same mental muscle that helps us understand people in the real world."
Explanation:
The above two evidence factually support and substantiate the claim that 'people who read stories are better at communicating and understanding the feelings of others.'
The first evidence i.e. option B states that <u>the research revealed 'the children or adults who have been reading stories constantly their whole lives are able to recognize the thoughts or feelings of others more accurately' while the second evidence i.e. option C asserts logically that 'in attempt to understand the characters of stories, the same mental muscle is required for understanding people in real life.'</u>
Thus, these two pieces of evidence not only support but substantiates how reading comprehends our understanding of thoughts, opinions, or feelings of others. Hence, <u>options B and C</u> are the correct answers.
Answer:
c is the answer to the question
