1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kati45 [8]
3 years ago
10

PLEASE HELP ASAP

History
2 answers:
Elis [28]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

the answer is A

Explanation:

MatroZZZ [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Many shipbuilders gained wealth as a result of supplyin g the military

Explanation:

I just took the test, do not listen to any other answer. A is correct.

You might be interested in
HELP ME PLEASE
bulgar [2K]

Answer:

The Code of Hammurabi is often cited as the oldest written laws on record, but they were predated by at least two other ancient codes of conduct from the Middle East. The earliest, created by the Sumerian ruler Ur-Nam-mu of the city of Ur, dates all the way back to the 21st century B.C., and evidence also shows that the Sumerian Code of Li-pit-Ishtar of Isis was drawn up nearly two centuries before Hammurabi came to power. These earlier codes both bear a striking resemblance to Hammurabi’s commands in their style and content, suggesting they may have influenced one another or perhaps even derived from a similar source.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why do priests need writing??? please help asap
lora16 [44]
Here is some information to help youWhy Do Priests Need Philosophy?
DECEMBER 27, 2014 BY FR. JAMES V. SCHALL, SJ

When he (Aquinas) was not sitting, reading a book, he walked round and round the cloister, and walked fast and even furiously, a very characteristic action of men who fight their battles in the mind. (G. K. Chesterton, St. Thomas Aquinas.) 1
Here we are touching on what is the most important difference … between Christianity on the one hand, and Islam as well as Judaism on the other. For Christianity, the sacred doctrine is revealed theology; for the Jew and the Muslim, the sacred doctrine is, at least primarily, the legal interpretation of the Divine Law. The sacred doctrine in the latter sense has to say the least, much less to do with philosophy than the sacred doctrine in the former sense. It is ultimately for this reason that the status of philosophy was, as a matter of principle, much more precarious in Judaism and in Islam than in Christianity: in Christianity, philosophy became an integral part of the officially recognized and even required training of the student of the sacred doctrine. (Leo Strauss, Persecution and the Art of Writing.) 2
Over the years, I have been invited to speak at a number of seminaries—to St. Charles in Philadelphia, to Notre Dame in New Orleans, to the seminary in Bridgeport, to St. Patrick’s in Menlo Park, and I once taught at the Gregorian University in Rome. Looking back on my own studies, I have often considered the three years we spent in philosophical studies at Mt. St. Michael’s in Spokane to be the most interesting and formative ones of my many years of clerical and academic studies. In recent years, I have heard a number of professors in Catholic colleges tell me, though this is by no means universal, that much more real faith and theology exist in the philosophy department than in the theology or religious studies departments of their school. An army chaplain also told me recently that a Catholic chaplain has an advantage over the protestant chaplain who relies on scripture alone to explain everything. Very often the problem is one of reason and good sense, one that is more amenable to reason than to faith, as such. It belongs to Catholicism to respect both reason and revelation as if they belonged together, which they do.
Here I want to talk about philosophical studies for the priesthood. I take as my models Msgr. John Whipple and Msgr. Robert Sokolowski, both diocesan priests in the school of philosophy at the Catholic University of America, both good priests and fine scholars. But first I would like to recall the lecture that I gave at the Bridgeport seminary several years ago. It was later published as an appendix to my book, The Life of the Mind. The lecture was called “Reading for Clerics.” In 2011, at the Theological College at the Catholic University of America, I gave a talk, entitled “Liberal Education and the Priesthood.” It was later published in the Homiletic & Pastoral Review.3
In both of these lectures, I wanted to point out something that I learned in a most graphic way from C. S. Lewis’ book, An Experiment in Criticism.4 The philosophic enterprise begins, I suppose, when we first take seriously the admonition of the Delphic Oracle. Socrates often quoted it, namely, that we should “know ourselves.” To “know ourselves” also means taking up Socrates’ other famous admonition, in the Apology, that “the unexamined life is not worth living.” But let us suppose that we, in fact, do know and examine ourselves, clearly no mean feat, as it is so easy to deceive ourselves about ourselves. Even with a good insight into ourselves, we still would not know much, even if we were Aquinas who seemed to know just about everything. We all remember that shortly before St. Thomas died, he stopped writing. He looked at all that he had written and realized that, compared to God, all he knew was “but straw,” as he quaintly put it.
We could go two ways with this incident from Aquinas. We could decide that it was not worth the effort if, after a lifetime of study, we knew very little even about our specialties, let alone about ourselves and others. Or, as is much the better way, we could be delighted in knowing what we did learn, however minimal it might be, compared to everything out there available to be known.
5 0
3 years ago
Was the compromise of 1850 a wise effort to balance sectional differences or a futile attempt to push the slavery issue out of s
Phantasy [73]
<span>The compromise of 1850 turned out to be a misguided attempt to bury the issue of slavery. Even though it brought the country together at first, the results didn't last. The North wasn't on board because the Fugitive Slave Law required that they help return any and all runaway slaves.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
List the three principals on which a bureaucracy is built
ollegr [7]
Number one; hierarchy authority, the few top ranking officials.

Number two; job specialization, everyone has a job.

Number three; formalize rules, set established rules. All used to create efficiency
6 0
3 years ago
Which statement about the League of Nations is NOT true? A.Many Americans felt that the U.S. had no business joining an internat
-Dominant- [34]
<span>B) President Wilson convinced the Senate to ratify U.S. membership.

</span><span>US membership wasn't ratified..</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What new religious order founded by ignatius loyola stemmed out of the counter-formation
    6·1 answer
  • How do trade barriers affect the African economy today
    13·1 answer
  • In 1783 spain owned what is now the state of
    15·2 answers
  • Describe the geographic location of the United States
    12·1 answer
  • I need assistance with this, please organize them into 4 categories.
    6·2 answers
  • What types of businesses and industries are important to the economy of the eastern United States today?
    10·1 answer
  • 1. Identify the policy that was NOT started by Tang dynasty rulers.
    13·1 answer
  • Plz help!!!!!!! Image multiple choice
    15·1 answer
  • 4. How can the mass media help shape public opinion?
    13·1 answer
  • What does Article 2 of the Constitution focus upon?*
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!