Answer:
the others are already answered
Explanation:
For general intent, the prosecution need only prove that the defendant intended to do the act in question, whereas proving specific intent would require the prosecution to prove that the defendant intended to bring about a specific consequence through his or her actions, or that he or she perform the action
Answer: It upheld the Sherman Antitrust Act's authority over railroads
Explanation:
Answer:
the Checks and Balances system.
Explanation:
this should be right
What might you, as his colleague, advise him concerning the type of scrutiny he will be under is: d. Organizations sponsoring Medicare health plans are responsible for the behavior of their contracted representatives and will be conducting monitoring activities to ensure compliance with all applicable Federal law and guidance and plan policies. Furthermore, state agent licensure laws are not preempted and he must abide by their requirements.
<h3>What is medicare?</h3>
A medicare can be defined as a health insurance coverage that help to cover medical expenses.
Based on the given scenario what you might advise him concerning the type of scrutiny he will be under is that company that is incharge of the medicare plan are the one incharge of the representatives behavior.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about medicare here:brainly.com/question/1960701
#SPJ1
