1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bess [88]
4 years ago
12

We cannot unlock our child from the closet because if we do, she will want to roam the house. If we let her roam the house, she

will want to roam the neighborhood. If she roams the neighborhood, she will get picked up by a stranger in a van, who will sell her in a sex slavery ring in some other country. Therefore, we should keep her locked up in the closet.
Explanation: In this example, it starts out with reasonable effects to the causes. For example, yes, if the child is allowed to go free in her room, she would most likely want to roam the house -- 95% probability estimate[1]. Sure, if she roams the house, she will probably want the freedom of going outside, but not necessarily "roaming the neighborhood", but let’s give that a probability of say 10%. Now we start to get very improbable. The chances of her getting picked up by a stranger (.05%) in a van (35%) to sell her into sex slavery (.07%) in another country (40%) is next to nothing when you do all the math:

.95 x .10 x .0005 x .35 x .0007 x .4 = about 1 in 25,000,000.

Morality and legality aside, is it really worth it to keep a child locked in a closet based on those odds?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Alexus [3.1K]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Even if you, as a parent, can actually leave morality and legality aside - which is pretty difficult, if not impossible - your decision of keeping the child locked, in order to protect her from something very unlikely, will only lead to very negative behaviour of the child that will be much more likely.

You might be interested in
As a direct contact with European explorers, the Native American population
vredina [299]
C.moved away native Americans got diseases so they started dying
8 0
3 years ago
Do you believe that Americans may be somewhat more ethnocentric than people in the other Western industrial nations? If so, why
Vikentia [17]

Answer& Explanation : I don't believe Americans are ethnocentric than people in the other Western industrial nations. I think most liberated nations tend to measure other people's culture by using their own cultures as the basement of those judgements. America may seem to be more ethnocentric than others only because it is one culture that is always on the spotlight and has been popularized by media and even by people from other nations who adopt certain behavior from Americans. The fact that America is more on the lime light make their views seem more dominant and because they are more expressive when compared to other Western cultures otherwise most western and even some part of Eastern cultures are ethnocentric the difference is they are not on the spot light for everyone to know how they feel.

5 0
4 years ago
Price elasticity of demand is (-) 4. By what percentage the quantity
skad [1K]

Answer:

=200

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a pattern in the American family
sdas [7]

Answer:

As the options for the question are not mentioned, lets discuss the general pattern of an American family.

On an average, an American family will mostly contain 3 people. The pattern of living is a nuclear family style. A nuclear family means the mother, father ans the children living together. However, there are some minorities in America where grandparents also live in the family and their are other families consisting on only a single parent. However, the wide majority is of a nuclear family.  

4 0
3 years ago
Nepal is the best example of religious tolerance.justify the statement with example​
Shtirlitz [24]

Explanation:

There may have been no place on earth where religious minorities were safer and happier than under the Hindu Kingdom of Nepal. There are several examples of how Nepal has maintained this religious tolerance for all even after its republicanisation:

King Tribhuvan, great King of Nepal, was born a Hindu and died one and greatly respected and admired Buddhism, so much to the extent that he declared Buddha Jayanti (the birth of Lord Buddha) a national holiday of a Hindu kingdom!

After his death in 1955, his son, King Mahendra, banned all animal sacrifice on Buddha Jayanti day, and hosted the 4th World Buddhist Conference in Kathmandu of the year 1956.

Nepal has had no religious conflict for millennia and all people’s faith has been respected. Kathmandu is a city important equally to Buddhists and Hindus, but we have not engaged in Crusade-like behavior such as Christians and Muslims for Jerusalem.

A mosque in Nepal, Kashmiri Masjid, is located almost across the way from Narayanhity Palace, which is where Nepali kings used to reside.

I am aware that many Western-based Christian groups are publishing articles on the internet such as “Nepal outlaws conversion to Christianity” and “Nepal Just Made Evangelism Illegal” attempting to demean the very foundation of tolerance which we were built upon and call it a obstacle to ‘religious freedom.’ However, it is well known that Christian missionary outfit wants to evangelise the whole of Nepal and convert every last Nepali from their ‘futile, Satanic, demon worshipping religions’ as they call it, to Christianity as they did in North and South America, Africa, and Northeast India. They call this ‘religious freedom.’

I feel that the anti-conversion bill that was passed last year in Nepal is actually beneficial to the country and targets those conversion that take place because of force, allurement, and bribery, as well as rooting out the perpetrators. Do not get me wrong, you are more than safe and welcome to practice your religion in Nepal peacefully, but if you interfere with other religion and their affairs, know that you will face the consequences and are provoking religious tolerance in the country.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Discussion of the judicial department is in article ________ of the texas constitution.
    14·1 answer
  • True or falseboth romanticists and transcendentalists believed that people could improve themselves.
    10·1 answer
  • How do public safety regulations protect workers
    5·2 answers
  • Is the tale of Odysseus’s visit to Aeaea mythology or history?
    5·1 answer
  • What is contribute to a poor educational system in Africa​
    10·1 answer
  • How do drugs affect the brain? Why are many of them addictive? In this activity you will be learning about how specific drugs al
    7·1 answer
  • What do "voting in elections" and "volunteering at a homeless shelter" have in common?
    13·1 answer
  • Can someone friend me lol
    12·2 answers
  • Why does Truman say it is important to conserve resources today?
    12·2 answers
  • What mountain peak is farthest from the center of the Earth?​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!