Answer: D. All of the above
Explanation: The three options listed could explain why the productivity of labor increased with a reduction in the quantity of labor hired. The law of diminishing returns states that as more and more inputs of production are added, a time comes in when additional inputs causes no corresponding increase in productivity. At points like this a reduction in the input added would restore productivity.
Reducing the amount of labor obviously is a labour saving technical change. Changes in organizational innovation can also result in changes in productivity.
Answer:
High prices of products as well as increases poverty.
Explanation:
The stock market declines sharply, reducing consumers’ wealth that leads to high prices of products as well as increases poverty. The federal government increases spending on national defense that decreases the foreign reserves and money for other fields of the country. A technological improvement raises productivity which increases the economy of the country as well as standard of living. A recession overseas causes foreigners to buy fewer U.S. goods that leads to lower income of the country and purchasing power of the country. Due to this, there is less money for other fields and institutions.
Answer:Economic rent-$320,000
Opportunity Cost-80,000
Explanation:
Economic rent is the extra amount or addition earned by a production resource here and in this context,Mr Kurt is the resource.In this scenario,the extra amount he earned as a professional golfer having quit engineering for it and thus had a step-up(addition) of $320,000.
While the opportunity cost which known as the alternative forgone in order in favour of another alternative in a decision process here is $80,000.In this case,he had to forego engineering job($80,000) and therefore concentrate on professional golfing which paid him more(400,000) not omitting the fact that he could have engaged in the two jobs at same time.
