A big similarity was that both medieval Europe and Japan employed feudalism; roughly summarized in Europe as: King --> Clergy --> Nobles --> Knights (Vassals) --> Serfs; summarized in Japan as: Emperor --> Shoguns --> Daimyo --> Samurai (Vassals) --> Serfs. Addressing the second portion of yoru question, it's YOUR opinion, so I'll leave it up to you :)
Further Topics for Study: Feudalism, Serfs, Vassals, Medieval Europe, Medieval Japan, the Heian Period, The Sengoku Period, the Dark Ages, Christianity, Animism, and more!
Answer:
Hobbes believed that a government headed by a king was the best form that the sovereign could take. Placing all power in the hands of a king would mean more resolute and consistent exercise of political authority, Hobbes argued.
Explanation:
hope it helped
<h2>
<u>Explanation:</u></h2>
There were a lot of factors -- most were not what Schlieffen expected.
1. France wasn't that easy to conquer. It took longer than Schlieffen thought.
2. Belgium did not respond the way Schlieffen expected. They fought Germany.
3. Russia was more flexible that Schlieffen thought. They mobilized quicker and were much more adept at using their forces.
4. In all, Schlieffen made plans that were inflexible and did not account for the way wars are actually fought.
The Hittites believed that all gods were legitimate gods. Whenever the Hittites conquered a certain group, they adopt the gods in which that group believed in. The Assyrians were responsible for the folding of the Hittite Empire. The Assyrians began to move into larger parts of the Fertile Crescent.
