The Great Awakening was a movement that began because religious leaders feared that colonists had lost their religious excitement. It encouraged people to question authority, first of the church and later the British Government
The Enlightenment was an intellectual movement that emphasized reason and science. It was based on the belief that in natural laws that controlled how the universe worked, that natural laws should be the basis of all government. It encouraged people to question god
Basically they are opposites but they effect each other a lot
Answer:
I <em>do</em> agree with Roosevelt.
Explanation:
The battle referred in the question is The Battle of San Juan Hill and took place on Jul1 1, 1898, as part of the American-Spanish War. This battle was a very important factor to determine the course of the war. In this battle, Roosevelt was in charge of the Rough Riders (1st United States Volunterr Cavalry). The Battle of San Juan Hill is also considered their biggest triumph.
The Medal of Honor is an award delivered by the President of the US in name of the Congress and it is given to members of the Army, Navy or Air Force who have expressed acts of valor during their service. This battle was won by the Rough Riders, and according to what historians say, Roosevelt was, perhaps, the most important factor. So, according to the standards, I agree with Roosevelt.
Answer:
Explanation:
Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. Here the phrase “overall consequences” of an action means everything the action brings about, including the action itself. For example, if you think that the whole point of morality is (a) to spread happiness and relieve suffering, or (b) to create as much freedom as possible in the world, or (c) to promote the survival of our species, then you accept consequentialism. Although those three views disagree about which kinds of consequences matter, they agree that consequences are all that matters. So, they agree that consequentialism is true. The utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham is a well known example of consequentialism. By contrast, the deontological theories of John Locke and Immanuel Kant are nonconsequentialist.
Consequentialism is controversial. Various nonconsequentialist views are that morality is all about doing one’s duty, respecting rights, obeying nature, obeying God, obeying one’s own heart, actualizing one’s own potential, being reasonable, respecting all people, or not interfering with others—no matter the consequences.
This article describes different versions of consequentialism. It also sketches several of the most popular reasons to believe consequentialism, along with objections to those reasons, and several of the most popular reasons to disbelieve it, along with objections to those reasons.
