Answer:
B) cognitive dissonance
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question his attitude change is best explained by cognitive dissonance. This is defined as the state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, especially as relating to behavioral decisions and attitude change. Which is exactly what Fernando is experiencing.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
The answer is: letter a, To protect national security.
Explanation:
This incident occurred in <em>2016.</em> Taobao is one of the online shopping websites owned by "Alibaba Group." It was placed on the blacklist by the U.S. because of selling<em> "counterfeit goods."</em> However, it was removed from the blacklist in 2012, since it showed efforts in combating piracy.
One reason for putting Taobao in the blacklist is to protect national security. This is the responsibility of the government to the nation when it feels threatened by anything harmful. The pirated goods were considered a threat to the nation. It can also result to financial loss to the owners due to stolen intellectual properties.
Thus, this explains the answer.
Answer:
Employees frequently complain about the inconsistent assistance they receive from the HR department due to its large size.
Explanation:
Having a specialized, embedded HR unit is beneficial to each, specific unit, as HR would cater to every department and its special needs. On the contrary, centralized HR tends to give inconsistent help, as they always assign a different person or team when a problem arises.
So, if the employees complained that they cannot receive adequate help from the centralized HR, it would be wise to do what Roberta suggested.
Answer:
b. They are treated differently because the loss in value of Carol's stock is the result of a sale, while the loss in value of Dave's stock is simply a decline in value.
Explanation:
Although the stock owned by Carol and by Dave declines in value by $2,000, however Carol only has a realized and recognized loss of $2,000. The main factor in determining whether a disposition has taken place often whether an identifiable event has occurred. In the current scenario, Carol’s stock sale qualifies as a disposition and the Dave’s stock value decline does not qualify as a disposition and is simply a decline in value.
Answer:
Press a standard key on the keyboard.
Move the mouse.
Explanation: