Answer:
1.88% and $1,339
Explanation:
The computation of the amount of change revenue is shown below:-
Amount of change revenue = Recent year - prior year
= $72,618 - $71,279
= $1,339
Percentage of change revenue = (Recent year - prior year) ÷ Prior years
= ($72,618 - $71,279) ÷ $71,279
= $1,339 ÷ $71,279
= 1.88%
We simply applied the above formulas
Base on my research this type of argument is baseless but it depends on the 100% free enterprise market system. With this system, the government doesn't have regulatory powers to protect the interest of the consumers from the financial institutions. In a situation that without the interest rate modulation, the rate charged on loans could be 40% while the rate paid on savings could be 1%. If this happens the financial institutions will not have to pay FDIC insurance to ensure the solvency of the overall system.
A form of business ownership that provides limited liability to its owners, but is taxed as a partnership is a Limited Liability Company (LLC).
Limited Liability Company (LLC) is a form of business structure that gives protection to its owners against any debts or liabilities owned by the company. This means that the liability of the owners is limited to the amount of investment they have in the company.
This type of business is growing primarily in the United States. They do not pay taxes on their profits directly. Their profits and losses are passed through to members, who report them on their individual tax returns.
Therefore, Liability Company (LLC) is a form of business ownership that provides limited liability to its owners, but is taxed as a partnership.
Learn more about Limited Liability Company (LLC) in this link : brainly.com/question/13888388
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
Maple Farms, Inc. v. City School District of Elmira.
Could something like this bankrupt a company?
Yes, it can, if the proper forecast were not done taking into consideration all of the possible variables at medium and long-range.
Do you agree with the decision?
It was a tough decision because the court declared in its decision that the performance was not impracticable, as Maple Farm Inc indicated when decided to break the contract.
In strict theory, I agree with the court's decision because the explanation was that an "impractical" occurred when an event happened totally unexpected. And in this case, Mapple Farm Inc could have taken extra provisions knowing that milk had a 10% increase the last year and had the chance of more increases in the present year.
That is how a company can avoid this type of situation. Taking better provisions, contemplating all kinds of variables, knowing that in the future, something unexpected can happen and could be prevented with the proper forecast.
Answer:
Top level managers
Middle level managers
First level mangers
Explanation:
Management involves the process of planning, organizing, directing and controlling. These functions are carried out by the top level managers, middle level managers and first level managers.
Top level managers are those in charged of setting the long term goal of a company, they are basically the board of directors of a company.
The middle managers are the engine of a company, they push the line managers to work and supervices their work.
The first level managers are also known as floor managers, they oil the engine of the company.
