Answer:
The claim that is arguable is <em>B: Senators should not have term limits.</em>
Explanation:
I chose B because it is the only claim that contains a personal opinion. All the others are facts: <em>there are more Democrats that Republicans in Congress, the Constitution divides powers between the federal government and state governments, and the United States has 50 states</em>. All of these are facts, but the second one (<em>B</em>) is a personal opinion, and we realize that when reading the word <em>should</em>, therefore is arguable because another person might have a different opinion about the same subject.
Answer:
it would be A
Explanation:
Why would anyone do something that drastic if its not that important
A statement or action expressing disapproval of or objection to something.
Answer:
The correct option is E: regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted
Explanation:
In Option A has problems with parallelism. The "IT" before the granted made the sentence not to be parallel.
In Option B, the problem i find with this one is that there is no "and" before the granting. You cannot have a list in a sentence without an "and" before the last item on the list
Option C is also wrong because it is not parallel. Mandated cannot be parallel to "it granted". Same error as the first.
Option D is also wrong because it is incorrect to use "ing" forms as verb.
Option E: This eliminates all the errors from the previous options, hence is the correct option.
Answer:
history threat
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the problem that is most likely affecting this experiment is history threat. This term refers to the way groups differ based on history events. Since the groups that arrived the first day wanted to see something new, once they did foot traffic lowered to normal levels because those people have already seen the museum.
