Answer: False
Explanation:
Compromise is really an alternative to political parties. It seems they tend to stick with whatever they originally believe, even if its correct or not.
Answer:
At the 1787 convention, delegates devised a plan for a stronger federal government with three branches—executive, legislative and judicial—along with a system of checks and balances to ensure no single branch would have too much power.
Explanation:
i think this might help you
Answer:
more, more
Explanation:
Contrary to what many could think, and intuition would <em>suggest, more people are increasingly using social media for seeking friendship and romance in the context of an ever-changing world.</em>
The use of the internet sometimes enables the persons to carry better communication and some undesired variables play for the good:
<u>The lack of face to face interaction will often make people disregard the expression, intonation and gestures normally present in a face to face relationship.</u>
<em>This will make meeting persons on the internet more "idealized" forms and will make people fill the void by themselves in an unprecedented manner</em>.
The number of people that met on the internet and will pursue a further relationship increased in the past decade.
Answer:
A. Democratic reforms.
Explanation:
Human rights has always been tied to the democratic party, so this answer just makes the most sense to me.
The other answers don't make sense because while the UN is connected to human rights, the sentence doesn't check out for it. Supporting human rights does help the UN, but it doesn't really support it. Military allies also makes sense, but again, human rights doesn't support them. The U.S. economic interests doesn't make sense either, because human rights, while needed, are often expensive for the government, which is why they won't do much.