1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kazeer [188]
2 years ago
15

This document was written in 1987. Which advantages does the writer have when writing so many years after the events took place?

Select all that apply. The writer is able to view the events with a more detached eye. The writer is able to ignore events that do not fit with his thesis. The writer is able to place events into better context with those going around the world. The writer is able to mimic the prevailing thoughts of historians. The writer is able to see the effects of decisions, making it easier to determine what is important.
History
2 answers:
galben [10]2 years ago
4 0

A. The writer is able to view the events with a more detached eye.

C. The writer is able to place events into better context with those going around the world.

E. The writer is able to see the effects of decisions, making it easier to determine what is important.

Lilit [14]2 years ago
3 0
The answers are: 
-<span>The writer is able to view the events with a more detached eye
-</span><span>The writer is able to place events into better context with those going around the world. 
-</span>The writer is able to see the effects of decisions, making it easier to determine what is important.
The distance that the time gap provides enables the writer to be more objective, and place the events into better context with the events that surrounded them and the events that followed. 
You might be interested in
Where did the allies halted the german advance at the battle of the bulge?
SVEN [57.7K]
<span>Bastogne, Belgium 

Hope this helps!

-Payshence xoxo</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Pls help!!! <br><br> 5 problems that existed<br> after Europe decolonized
melamori03 [73]

Answer:

1. Trouble organizing a government system due to a lack of self-governing experience.

2. Being susceptible to coups and rebellions because of a lack of a strong, organized military.

3. Economic reliance on their parent countries, which caused their economies to be dependent on that of another country's.

4. Exploitation by other nations politically and economically, oftentimes through established monopolies.

5. Difficulties with establishing their native cultures, as they were under the influence of the European nations for so long.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What kind of government would an anarchist support
vfiekz [6]

Answer:

A lawlessness society and government

Explanation:

An Anarchist is someone who does not obey law and order, who disregards social norms and rules of established authority. An Anarchist may be described as someone who rejects the laid down laws and order of a given society. An Anarchist does not believe in the society being regularized by laws and order. Anarchists are those against political authority, people capable of creating anarchy in a society, reject all forms of hierarchical control by the authority. Anarchy is therefore a state constituted without laws and order, rules and social norms, a society without ruler. A state of Anarchy is a lawless society where there is no government, no constitution, lay down laws and orders are not complied with, no morality whatsoever, people who commit crime and walk freely in the society and go unpunished, that is, where there is no justice in the society, people’s fundamental rights are violated, people’s property attacked.

Pierre Joseph Proudhon, a French political writer and socialist was said to be the first person to willingly call himself an anarchist.

The kind of government an Anarchist will support is that government without constitution, law and order, that government that allows people to violate the laid down rules and social norms, that allows people to go against the political authority, government that allows self-governing of people and society consensus, that is, allows people to do what they want without questioning by the government, that guarantees individual’s right of liberty, a government that allows political power and resources to be shared equally by all in a given society.

4 0
2 years ago
Which of the following led to the Panic of 1819? Select all that apply.
yKpoI14uk [10]
Is their options to choose from ?
3 0
3 years ago
What politcal party was formed in 1848 to oppose the spread of slavery
algol13
The answer to your question is the American Anti-Slavery Society
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 7. The code of conduct of Buddhism is known as the<br> What?
    8·1 answer
  • The region of Kashmir indicated on the map in white is an area of
    5·2 answers
  • How did the boarding school set up by the federal government in the late eighteen hundreds attempt to promote assimilation of Na
    13·1 answer
  • Which enlightened thinker is considered the first feminist
    7·2 answers
  • This is a policy by the Federal Reserve to reduce the money supply and slow down economic
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these were not helped by the Great Society?
    9·2 answers
  • What does it mean that federal law is superior to state law
    12·2 answers
  • What led to conflict lexington and concord
    11·2 answers
  • Write a paragraph explaining how the English Civil War transformed the political front in England and laid part of the groundwor
    10·1 answer
  • 13. The time when residents of the Up Country were forced to take the law into their own hands,
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!