I am not sure but maybe he wanted to make things suspenseful and make new problems and conflict
The trials described by Franklin took place in New Jersey, they took place at the same time and were not fair.
Benjamin Franklin wrote "A Witch Trial at Mount Holly," a short text that satirized the witch trials taking place in the country.
By reading this text, we can see that:
- Franklin describes the trial of a man and a woman who were accused of witchcraft.
- The accusers said they saw them making the pigs sing and the sheep dance.
- The trials put the accused through absurd tests, which caused the death of the accused, or forced them to admit the practice of witchcraft.
Franklin's intention in addressing this topic was to show how the witch trials were not coherent, but rather a crazy illusion. Franklin had this thought because he was so influenced by the stimulation of reason shown in the Enlightenment, which made him critically observe everything.
More information:
brainly.com/question/9605006?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Commensalism is a type of symbiotic relationship where one party benefits and the other party is not significantly affected. A hermit crab takes over a discarded shell of a snail and uses it for his house. The hermit crab benefits and the snail are not affected - it's already discarded the shell and is nowhere around.
Explanation:
Answer:
The right option should be B
The pronoun case of the bolded word <em>him </em>is objective case.
The words <em>to him </em>are used as indirect object in this sentence, which means that the case that the pronoun is used in is the objective case, or the accusative, in technical terms. The other case would be the subjective case, but given that there is no obvious subject in this sentence (it is implied), there are no subjective cases.
