The so called <em>two-state solution</em> is a proposition of a solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The idea is of "having two States for two different groups of people." The two-state solution intends to create an independent State of Palestine next to the State of Israel, in the west of the Jordan River. The biggest problems is how to divide both countries, since the boundary between the two states is still subject to troubling arguments and disputes. The Palestinian and Arab leadership insist on the "1967 borders", has not been accepted by Israel.
As long as the problem of the boarders are not solved regarding Jerusalem, the Two State Solution will not be the one to solve the problem
I believe your answer is C correct me if I'm wrong. I hope this helps
<span>Good Morning!
Arafat means that if peace is not achieved in Palestine, many wars and violence will spread throughout the Middle East. We have several examples of this chaos scenario nowadays.
</span><span>A) If Palestinian peace is not achieved, all Middle East nations will descend into chaos and violence.
</span><span>
Hugs!</span>
If Stonewall Jackson were leading the Second Corps at Gettysburg, there would have been an attack at Cemetery Hill (the Union right) on the third day.
<span>As a result, the Union cavalry would have rushed to support the Union position there. Instead, they were able to intercept J.E.B. Stuart and his Confederate cavalry as they attempted to get in the Union rear. </span>
<span>The Confederate cavalry would have been able to capture the Union artillery and turn the Union's own cannons against them. </span>
<span>Pickett's charge would be known as the most effective fixing movement of the war. </span>With the Union Army of the Potomac destroyed, Abraham Lincoln would have been forced to sue for peace.
<span>As the second president of the Confederacy, Robert E. Lee would have signed legislation freeing the slaves.</span>
He thought it was a reduction of personal liberty.
John L. Sullivan was a boxing legend. Even having drinking problems his entire life, he took a step ahead on stopping this practice. He decided to not dring anymore as long as he lived, but he had no hard feelings against a man who does. In his view If a man can take a drink and get away with it, so much the better, but yours truly has found long since that whiskey is not for him. He was against prohibition though. He thought it was a reduction of personal liberty.
