Answer:
b
Explanation:
took the test the other day today dude
An evaluative thesis from the following options is "Keeping a regular schedule is so much better than letting each day's schedule be different and random".
A claim that expresses an opinion about the subject, on the other hand, is one that elicits criticism is an evaluative thesis. It renders a decision. It declares that one subject is superior to or inferior to another. The opinion expressed in option B, which illustrates an evaluative thesis, is that adhering to a schedule is preferable to following a random timetable.
The language used in the abovementioned statement is provoking which is a feature of an evaluative thesis.
Thus, the correct option is B.
To learn more about evaluative thesis here
brainly.com/question/28014427
#SPJ1
Answer:
Odysseus made it sound as if "nobody" stabbed Polyphemus in the eye, so the other cyclops let him go. The curse that is revealed a the end of his encounter with the Cyclops foreshadows Odysseus's difficult journey.
Explanation:
The clever word play:
Odysseus tries to outsmart and taunt the Cyclops at every turn, first by getting him drunk on wine and then by telling the Cyclops that his name is Outis, which means nobody. This is so that when the Cyclops is telling the other giants who injured him, it sounds like Polyphemus is shouting "Nobody" stabbed him in the eye. This confuses the other Cyclops who may have otherwise tried to help Polyphemus catch Odysseus.
The Curse:
Odysseus and his men sail away from the island by tricking the now blinded Cyclops that they were part of the herd of sheep that Polyphemus was tending. The curse comes when Odysseus decides to try to taunt the monster further and shouts out his real name. What this does is reveal his identity and allows the Cyclops to curse Odysseus in revenge. Polyphemus prays to his father, the great Poseidon, asking that Odysseus's journey back home to Ithaca be fraught with the loss of his friends and his ship.
There should be a comma between the words 'Wisconsin' and 'whose'
because since there is a peiod, the senences read
georgia o'kefe was an american painter from wisconson, meaning: georga o'keef, american, from wisconson
second one
whose detailed close-ups of flowers brought her world renown
this is a clause, the two sentances should be joined with a comma because theh though continues
the sentances should read:
"Georgia O'Keefe was an American painter from Wisconsin, whose detailed close-ups of flowers brought her world renown."
