Mexican treatment of American immigrants
Explanation:
Law of April 6, 1830- The law refers to Mexican state attempts to withhold its sovereignty over the state of Texas which was under the impression of being annexed by the United States.
The state of Texas was colonized by Mexico after it gained independence from Spanish rule. However, a large influx of immigrants from the US posed a significant threat to the culture and demographics of Texas. If not checked on time, Mexican generals feared the loss of sovereignty over Texas.
Hence, Mexican Congress came out with Law of April 6, 1830, which was designed to <u>increase Mexican hold over Texas</u> and also <u>signalled a tectonic shift in policy of Mexican treatment of American immigrants in Texas.
</u>
AnswerThere was quite a lot of U.S. imperialism
Explanation:
As, In the early 19th century, most of the nations of Latin America fought their wars of independence, freeing themselves from the colonial control of Spain. Other, stronger powers were thus able to invest heavily in Latin American economies, giving them lots of influence over the new governments.
I know the first blank but not sure about the second one
The first one is In the terms of the treaty, France gave up all its territories in mainland North America, effectively ending any foreign military threat to the British colonies there. So basically France gave up the mainland in North America
1. India
2. Buddha
1. Sacred
2. Desire, Suffering
3. Desire, Suffering
4. Suffering, Eightfold Path
Hope these help
Answer:
In this way, the historiography of the Civil War is somewhat unique. Rarely in human history has a conflict’s losing side been lent such considerable say in how the textbooks remember it. As such, American social studies curricula have long been hobbled by one of the most pervasive myths in US history: that the Civil War was fought to preserve (or undermine) the spectral concept of “states’ rights.”
Explanation:
