1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
seropon [69]
3 years ago
7

Weakness of the constitution

History
1 answer:
Lesechka [4]3 years ago
8 0
It was too much power to congress
You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP!! 25 POINTS!!! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT!!!
Sloan [31]

Answer:

ok i will give a try. I am writing as if we are in the 19th century.

hello. i'm from albania and i'm here from a better life cauce i hear there is a virgin place and the best to start life from scratch. in albania i worked in hard jobs and I was not earning enough money to continue living normally.

that's all i think in this moment.

5 0
3 years ago
Did mexico resent the annexation or texas
polet [3.4K]
Well judging from the battle of the Alamo they didn't want it to happen.
5 0
3 years ago
The more times your credit is checked when applying for credit cards or loans will help build your credit rating.
sergeinik [125]

false.

Hope this helps!

3 0
3 years ago
Infer why the free enterprise system was so important to entrepreneurs and why entrepreneurs were crucial to the free enterprise
liq [111]

Free enterprise is important to entrepreneurs because it creates incentives for creativity and innovation. Entrepreneurs know that their enterprise will be rewarded and thus are motivated to work to improve.  Entrepreneurs are crucial to free enterprise as they create innovations and  jobs that improve the lives of people

7 0
3 years ago
3 Points
REY [17]

Answer:

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and therefore the rights and privileges it confers upon American citizens could not apply to them.[2][3] The decision was made in the case of Dred Scott, an enslaved black man whose owners had taken him from Missouri, which was a slave-holding state, into the Missouri Territory, most of which had been designated "free" territory by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. When his owners later brought him back to Missouri, Scott sued in court for his freedom, claiming that because he had been taken into "free" U.S. territory, he had automatically been freed, and was legally no longer a slave. Scott sued first in Missouri state court, which ruled that he was still a slave under its law. He then sued in U.S. federal court, which ruled against him by deciding that it had to apply Missouri law to the case. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was one possible effect of the domestic slave trade
    7·2 answers
  • Why did admiral leahy feel the use of the bomb was ethically and morally incorrect
    8·2 answers
  • Who supported Jean D'arcs mission to meet the dauphine?
    11·1 answer
  • On what date was florida admitted as a state to the union
    12·1 answer
  • In 1732 CE the Muslims lost a key battle called the Battle of Tours. What region would Islam have spread too if the Muslims had
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following lists the steps required to add the Bill of Rights to the Constitution in the correct sequence?
    14·1 answer
  • Take another look at this source.
    14·2 answers
  • Which is a belief of socialism? (4 points) That government should not exist That government will ruin the economy That people sh
    7·2 answers
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise established at the constitutional convention, stated?
    14·2 answers
  • 100 points, will mark brainliest, answer fast!
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!