Answer:
When wording the statement of your specific purpose, use verbs that refer to observable or measurable behavior.
Explanation:
A speech has a general purpose: to inform, to motivate, to entertain, or to persuade. But it also has a specific purpose, and it is important to write down a specific purpose statement before trying to write down the central idea of a speech. A specific purpose statement should be written using verbs that refer to observable or measurable behavior, and it should refer to what the speaker will accomplish with the speech. For example, when writing an informative speech, the specific purpose will use the verb inform -"I will inform my audience about the Amazon deforestation." Knowing that that is my specific purpose will help me develop the thesis statement. It will also help me assess how effective my speech was, if I really accomplished what I wanted.
The idea of what it means to be successful after high school greatly varies from person to person, as everyone has different goals and aspirations for their future. In today's society, being called successful is often associated with wealth, however for many this is not the goal.
Many people strive to be morally successful over wealth, as they feel that being part of a good cause is more important. Many professions that fall under this category are joining the army to protect and serve, representing your country in international sports, or participating in a non-profit organization.
Answer: A. Pathos and logos
In this passage, the speaker uses both pathos, which is an appeal to emotion, and logos, which refers to an appeal based on logic. She first states that because she does not have a license, she cannot drive. This is a logical argument. Afterwards, she states that it is "totally embarrasing" to be driven to the party by her father. In this case, the speaker makes an appeal to pathos, or to emotions.
Henry Fleming is a character in a book titled "The Red Badge of Courage" by Stephen Crane where he was mainly described as the main protagonist, the Youth. He started off as a young, naive soldier who wants to join the military without thinking seriously about it until his character grows into accepting his cowardice and selfishness and eventually comes out to be one of the bravest soldiers.
Ani analyses how "DeLuca's haphazard patchwork of reasoning and evidence leaves the reader wondering whether he believes his own claim". According to Ani he quotes not only supporters of the Nobel price committee but also detractors. He includes a sampling of Dylan's lyrics and leaves them to speak for themselves.
The evidence (quotes) from the article that best supports Ani's evaluation are:
1. "And it’s a good thing [his lyrics] have been published, because if you’ve gone to see the famously sneering and syllable-garbling Dylan play live in recent years, you probably couldn’t understand a word he was singing."
We could interpret this quote as contradictory, it is not necessarily for or against Dylan's Nobel Price. You could say he is confusing his readers, he seems to be against the sung lyrics and for the published ones.
2. "On one end of Dylan's songwriting spectrum is the vengeful, resolute, and timeless 'Masters Of War' . . . . It’s high dudgeon at its finest: ‘Let me ask you one question: Is your money that good? / Will it buy you forgiveness? Do you think that it could?"
Ani also says that he does a sampling of the lyrics and allows them to speak for themselves. This excerpt shows part of a lyric from the song "Masters of War". He is not necessarily saying its a "good" or "bad" lyric, he describes it as: "vengeful, resolute, and timeless" the reader must decide about its quality or if it is the kind of work that deserves a Nobel Price.
