Answer with Explanation:
In order for a country to be considered "democratic," it needs to possess certain elements such as <em>allowing the citizens to have an active involvement in the country by having civic rights</em> and <em>having fair elections where citizens can elect their government officials.</em>
India, as a country, possess these elements. Ever since India declared itself as a free nation on August 15, 1947, the citizens were given the freedom to elect their government officials and take an active role in the country's civil and political affairs.
So, this clearly makes India a democratic country.
Answer:
Hello,
The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000
Explanation:
In the United States, the penalty for human trafficking is up to 15 year-life-in prison or a $1500000 fine.This act aims at stopping acts of human trafficking in the areas of sex trade and slavery.This Act further aims at preventing the acts of violence against women.Some of the steps to adopt that can reduce human trafficking acts include creating awareness on the matter and avoiding the purchase of goods and services that facilitate human trafficking.
Best of Luck!
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
