1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aalyn [17]
3 years ago
10

Sometimes friends join together into groups to have fun, but also to defend themselves against members of other groups. How are

such relationships similar to the alliances formed by the Great Powers of Europe ?
History
2 answers:
aleksley [76]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: Millitary Alliance or Aid

Explanation: Millitary Alliance or Aid; this is an existing accord between two countries on national security, by which the countries involved in this accord or agreement. agree to a mutual protection and support of eachother in case of a crisis that has not been recognised early enough. Who are the great powers of Europe, they are

1. UK

2. RUSSIA

3. GERMANY

4. ITALY

Those are examples of European great power of Europe who assist one another or help manages eachother other crisis.

HACTEHA [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

<em>The alliance formed by the Great Powers of Europe is cordial, reliable and strong within Europe and beyond.</em>

Explanation:

<em>The Big Four, also known as G4 or EU4, refers to France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom.[1] These countries are considered major European powers[2] and they are the Western European countries individually represented as full members of the G7, the G8, the G10 and the G20. France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom have been referred to as the "Big Four of Europe" since the interwar period (1919–1939), when the four countries signed the Four-Power Pact and the Munich Agreement.The term G4 was used for the first time when French President Nicolas Sarkozy called for a meeting in Paris[4] with Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Gordon Brown and Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel to consider the response to the financial crisis during the Great Recession. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development describes them as the "Four Big European Countries."</em>

<em />

Reasons for the Alliance of the Four Big European Countries

<em>A great power is a nation/state or group of nations or states, through its/their great economic, political and military strengths, is/are able to exert powers and influences not only over it/theirs own regions of the world, but beyond. In a modern context, recognized great powers first arose in Europe during the post-Napoleonic era. The formalization of the division between small powers and great powers came about with the signing of the </em><em>Treaty of Chaumont in 1814.</em>

<em></em>

<em>However, in modern context as experienced in the alliance of the G4, the leaders of the four countries usually have a series of joint video conference calls with the US president (see NATO Quint), or with other leaders, on international issues. With Barack Obama they discussed for example the TTIP, the Syrian civil War and the use of chemical weapons during the conflict, the Crimean Crisis and international sanctions against Russia, the post-civil war violence in Libya, the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, the 2014 American intervention in Iraq and the Ebola virus disease. With Russia's President Vladimir Putin, they discussed, for example, the Vienna peace talks for Syria.</em>

You might be interested in
Which statement defines Colonialism?
kozerog [31]
B
I think B is the correct answer because Colonialism is " Economically controlling any territory not owned by the controller"
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which event in history is seen by many people as the beginning of the great depression
kykrilka [37]

the stock market crash of 1929
7 0
3 years ago
Which group in Hawaii was in favor of annexation by the United States?
REY [17]

Answer:

A. Ordinary Hawaiians

<h2>Who encouraged the annexation of Hawaii and why?</h2>

There is a complicated history behind the United States of America's eventual conquest of Hawaii. One that a little letter simply cannot do credit to. I will only briefly touch on some of the most significant incidents and overarching ideas.

One may start in 1851, when the French were mistreating the Hawaiian government once more and there was genuine danger that they would spiral out of control. Hawaii attempted to give sovereignty to the British as a result, but they showed little interest. They then came close to the USA. They signed a document transferring sovereignty to the United States in the event of war. But there was never a necessity (and it is unlikely that America was any more interested in being responsible for that faraway place than The United Kingdom was).

However, compared to other foreign states, Hawaii garnered more commercial and social attention from America. The problem of annexation became more pressing as trade links deepened over time. In the late 1860s and early 1870s the desire for a treaty of reciprocity for trade became so great that it was considered a matter of reciprocity or annexation.

Kalkaua was chosen as king by the Hawaiian legislature in 1874. This was mostly brought on by the mischief (er, influence) of regional American interests. They worried that Queen Emma, a popular figure and the widow of a past monarch, was too pro-British. He oversaw the signing of the reciprocity pact. It also gave America some access to the perhaps significant Pearl Harbor.

However, King Kalkaua had his own ideas about how to rule and resented the limitations that others tried to impose on him. He distinctly lost the support of the majority of Hawaii's "foreign" population. Since they were of foreign descent—in many cases, they were Hawaii citizens—we have put the word in quotation marks. The Kalkaua government was not just a nuisance, but also mocked for its various scandals. Many of them were due to the king’s attempting to acquire funds to promote his interests, private and public.

In 1887, everything came to a head. American citizens and those of American ancestry in particular staged a blatant uprising, forcing the monarch to sign a new constitution that, incidentally, severely curtailed the right to vote (those who qualified to vote). There were other famous organizers, including Lorrin A. Thurston.

Around this period, the American government started to take a more expansionist stance. James G. Blaine was appointed Secretary of State by the Harrison administration in 1889. He and John L. Stevens, his choice to serve as Hawaii's diplomatic ambassador, had a strong ambition to annex the islands to the United States. In addition, things started to move in Hawaii. The Annexation Club, a covert group, was created. Ostensibly not to precipitate annexation, but only to be ready if the need arose… In 1893, it did really arise.

Queen Liliuokalani, the monarch of Hawaii, aimed to impose a new constitution (essentially undoing the restrictions imposed in 1887). The anti-monarchical forces mobilized as a result, and the queen was overthrown. Even if he wasn't actively involved in the overthrow in this case, Minister Stevens was undoubtedly "dirty." He was in close communication with the leading revolutionaries, quickly recognized the new administration, and ordered American forces to land (as a "precaution"). The troops did little more than remain in their camp on the coast, but it was evident that their presence intimidated the overthrown administration.

Of course, the Provisional Government was eager for quick annexation by the United States (as suggested by its name). Sadly, Grover Cleveland had recently beaten Benjamin Harrison, and the new American administration was not interested in supporting them. In fact, they gave the monarchy some serious thought! But annexation had to wait till Hawaii was taken in with the spoils of the Spanish-American War because it was not to be.

Thank you,

Eddie

8 0
2 years ago
How long did the "Long Parliament" meet (on
12345 [234]

Answer:

Correct answer is C. 20 years.

Explanation:

During the reign of Charles I Stuart Parliament literally had no meetings, which was not a custom in history of England.

The Parliament meet in November 1640 and lasted with breaks until 1660.

There were major events that happened during this period, including the Civil War, which of course disabled the normal functioning of it.

7 0
3 years ago
What caused the great stink of 1858?
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer:

i d k

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The KRISTALLNACHT was
    12·1 answer
  • Are you homeschooled,private ,public schooled
    9·2 answers
  • 1. With what does the Declaration of Independence begin?
    13·1 answer
  • Most wagons were pulled by___<br> A. Horses<br> B.mules<br> C.cows<br> D.oxen
    15·2 answers
  • Explain what the "red scare" was, (1950) and how did it start?
    6·1 answer
  • How does fascist aggression lead to WW11?
    12·1 answer
  • Which achievement of the Song Dynasty is supported by Source C ?
    14·1 answer
  • Italy's unification occurred in: <br><br> 1870<br> 1921<br> 1920<br> 1922
    7·2 answers
  • From where did nationalist leadership emerge?​
    9·1 answer
  • Points &amp; brainlist will be given!! NEED HELP! What major change to government did Emperor Shi Huangdi make after consolidati
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!