It would be that "c. the chairman of the veterans' bureau laundered nearly 200$ million" that was not a scandal associated with the harding administration, since this in fact happened during the previous term.
A is most likely right because a lot modern European countries get their borders from cultural and linguistic boundaries after old empires like Austria-Hungary, Russia, and Germany split up. Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Slovenia, just to name a few, were ethnic groups without countries before WW1.
B: isn't true, just look at eastern Europe in the 17th century, tons of ethnic groups living in one country. Even with more immigration to the Europe, most immigrants assimilate into European cultures.
C: Although geography can influence political borders to varying degrees, European nations don't strictly follow physical geographic features to my knowledge. There are a lot of borders based off of rivers you can see have stayed the same despite the rivers moving (Serbia and Croatia's border is a prime example)
D: I don't know what 'define' means in this context, but if it means religion and geography are the main reasons Europe get's their borders is just flat out wrong. We already talked about geography, but religion doesn't effect European borders since most European countries are christians and are secular. The only example I can think off the top of my head of religion affecting borders is in Ireland when they separated the protestant north from the rest of the island which was catholic.
Hope this helped you out :)
Answer:
Where are the options? Rewrite it again.
D.Japan takes control over Korea
Answer:
Yes there would be a gain to the United States from importing any of those products from Britain because it only has absolute advantage not comparative advantage.
Explanation:
Absolute advantage in international trade is the ability of a nation to produce more goods with its resources without considering that there might a better alternative to which resources can be deployed that would yield more output compared to its trading partners.
While on the other hand ,comparative advantage is when a country has a lower opportunity costs in producing an item compared to its rival nations.
Which means the country that has comparative advantage is given up less opportunities when producing its desired goods viz-a-viz its competing nations.
In other words,absolute advantage does not guarantee efficiency,only comparative advantage does.
