The comparison and contrast between the raft and the shore has something to do with freedom. On the river, Huck and Jim are free from the legal, societal and cultural structures which is the opposite if they were on the shore. However, their freedom on the raft was only for a short period of time. When<span> they went back on the shore, they were once again forced to comply with the </span>laws. The<span> similarities between the raft and the shore </span>are<span> natural. They are both are connected with geographical features.</span><span> </span>
I’m assuming this entire thing is cellular respiration. pathway a most likely represents alcoholic fermentation, B represent lactic acidosis fermentation, C probably represents aerobic cellular respiration. Alcoholic fermentation doesn’t occur in humans, it occurs in micro bacteria and yeast. Lactic acidosis fermentation occurs in humans when there is not oxygen. That’s why you breathe so heavily after sprinting. Cellular respiration just happens naturally. Idk if that’s what the question is asking so feel free to comment and if this helped, brain answer?
Another cell that shows the process of endocytosis should be drawn. When the second cell receives the protein, the model will show a folded plasma membrane around the protein. The model will show the membrane bringing the protein into the cell.
None of the provided options are reasonable. <span>comparing nutrient concentrations between the photic zone and the benthic zone can not tell you whether differences in concentrations between the photic and benthic zone are due to uptake by phytoplankton or because nutrients are sinking to the sea bottom and ocean stratification is preventing mixing. The approach of c</span><span>ontrasting nutrient uptake by autotrophs at different locations under different temperatures would not provide useful information on limiting nutrients. but rather uptake rates at different temperatures. It is likely that e</span>xperimentally enriching some areas of the ocean and compare their productivity to that of untreated areas can provide an indication of limiting nutrients, but this is not advisable, as it would have to be done on a large scale, and one cannot be sure of the ecological consequences. Also, because it would not be a controlled experiment, other factors could create 'noise' in the data. The last option, <span>observe antarctic ocean productivity from year to year to see if it changes, also does not help, as there is no correlation between nutrient concentrations using this approach. The best approaches would be either the last approach, but with the additional monitoring of nutrient concentrations, or under a controlled laboratory experiment.</span>
Answer:
I think it's d
Explanation:
I remember from a couple years ago I had to answer a question similar to this. I'm 90% sure I chose the last answer.
only choose my answer if you agree.
