Ask question

Ask question

All categories

4 years ago

15

my mom went and got her GED and she did very well, but her diploma isnt compatible with anything, so its basically like she did

it for nothing, why is this?

1 answer:

klio [65]4 years ago

3 0

Because she maybe didnt reach all the standards 2 really get all da benifits.

You might be interested in

A company paid $505,000 to purchase equipment and $15,500 to have the equipment delivered to and installed in the company's prod

Firdavs [7]

Answer:

Using the units-of-production method, the amount of depreciation expense the company would report in the income statement prepared for the year-ended October 31, 2018 would be $105,711.

Explanation:

The unit-of-production method is used when the asset value closely relates to the units of output it is able to produce. It is expressed with the formula below:

(Original Cost - Salvage value) / Estimated production capacity x Units/year

Depreciation expense (DE) is: ($520,500 - $5,500) / 28,500 operating hours x 11,700 hours = $211,421 yearly depreciation expense.

Depreciation from May 1 to October 31, 2018 (6 months): $211,421 / 2 = $105,711

5 0

3 years ago

Good Investments Company forecasts a $2.44 dividend for 2017, $2.62 dividend for 2018 and a $2.77 dividend for 2019 for Mountain

Ivan

Answer:

c.$29.37

Explanation:

First and foremost, it should be borne in mind that the intrinsic value of Mountain Vacations Corporation is the present value of its future dividends for the forecast period(2017-2019) plus the present value of dividend terminal value beyond the forecast period as shown thus:

Year 1 (2017) dividend $2.44

Year 2 (2018) dividend $2.62

Year 3 (2019) dividend $2.77

the terminal value of dividend=expected dividend per year after 2019/ cost of equity capital

expected dividend per year after 2019= $2.94

cost of equity capital =7%

terminal value=$2.94 /7%=$42.00

PV of future dividend=dividend/(1+cost of equity capital)^n

n is the year in which the future dividend is expected, it is 1 for 2017, 2 for 2018 , 3 for 2019 dividend and the terminal value(since the terminal value is already stated in 2019 terms)

intrinsic value of share=$2.44/(1+7%)^1+$2.62/(1+7%)^2+$2.77/(1+7%)^3+$42.00/(1+7%)^3

the intrinsic value of share=$41.11

It is obvious that the options are not correct

The question's inputs are wrong

2017 dividend should have been $1.74

2018 dividend should have been $1.87

2019 dividend should have been $1.98

dividend beyond 2019 should have been $2.10

terminal value=$2.10/7%=$30.00

intrinsic value of share=$1.74/(1+7%)^1+$1.87/(1+7%)^2+$1.98/(1+7%)^3+$30.00/(1+7%)^3

intrinsic value of share=$29.36(closest to c.$29.37)

6 0

3 years ago

As customers of pierre’s dress shoppe prepared their wardrobes for winter, they purchased all of the long-sleeved dresses he had

laila [671]

The appropriate response is sales revenue. Revenue is the measure of cash that an organization really gets amid a particular period, including rebates and conclusions for returned stock. It is the "best line" or "gross pay" figure from which costs are subtracted to decide net salary.

3 0

4 years ago

You call a coworker to see if they can come help you solve a problem<br>

Sholpan [36]

Yes/true/correct/not false

8 0

4 years ago

Consider public policy aimed at smoking.

andreyandreev [35.5K]

Answer:

1. government shoud increase price by 50%. so it would be $3

2. larger effect 5 years from now

3. this is true due to their limited finance compared to adults

Explanation:

1. prices elasticity = % change in quantity demanded ÷ % change in price

price elasticity = 0.4

% change in dmd = 20%

% change in price = ?

$0.4=\frac{0.20}{?}$

we cross multiply

? = 0.20/0.4

= 0.5

= 50%

so if the government wants to reduce smoking by 20%, it has to increase the price of cigarettes by half of its price= $2 + $1 = $3

2. goods usually have more elastic demand as time goes on. So if cigarette price is permanently raised, it would have a bigger effect five years from now. This is based on the fact that the people may not feel short run effect of the increase as they would in the long run. But gradually given this increase, people may start to gradually reduce their smoking.

3. The effect of the change in price would be more felt on the teenagers. this is due to the fact that they have limited financial strength compared to adults. Also they are new to smoking compared to the adults and are more likely to be less involved in the habit.

6 0

3 years ago