Answer:
not sure i would assume more delicately?
Explanation:
The correct answer is C, since one of the subjects on which Walt Whitman more wrote was on the death, on which it was extended without rejection some. The existence of the soul as an element after death was an irrefutable belief for him.
Whitman wrote openly about death and sexuality, including prostitution. For him the human soul is immortal and is in a state of constant and progressive development, a belief that he showed in his works.
The word ain't is a contraction for am not, is not, are not, has not, and have not in the common English language vernacular.
The usage of ain't remains being a subject of controversy in English. Ain't is typically used by several speakers in oral and informal settings, especially in certain regions and dialects.
The real beginnings of the word ain’t cannot be defined exactly. However, linguists have been able to trace the word back to a certain extent. The contraction seems to have stemmed from amn’t, which combines the words am and not into a somewhat difficult result. This form, according to Merriam-Webster.com, was created in 1618 and is generally linked with Scottish and Irish speakers. So that, Amn't as a contraction of am not is known from 1618.
I think it’s D) a promising future sorry if it’s wrong
Answer:
The correct answer is the love Francesco Petrarch felt for Laura and Laura's beauty.
Explanation:
Francesco Petrarch (1304-1374) was an Italian lyricist and humanist whose love poems to his beloved idealized <em>Laura </em>had a big impact on the <em>Renaissance </em>(approx. 1300-1600). In his poems, he expresses his feelings towards Laura, who unfortunately for Petrarch, doesn't share the same feelings towards him. He describes Laura's beauty and how deeply in love he is for her and how even with the past of the time that does not change.
