Answer:
117
Explanation:
Please mark brainliest and have a great day!
Answer:
Section 1..... Italy has a comparative advantage in the production of shoes, and Austria has a comparative advantage in the production of fish.
Section 2.... 5 pounds of fish, ; 1/10 pairs of shoes
Section 3..... A and C.
Explanation:
The comparative advantage is known to be a term that is in use in the economic world,where a country or company has the ability of producing goods at extremely lower cost compared to that of its partners or competitors.
This is very important because, the country or company will be able to produce its goods by making use of fewer resources.
And thereby gives the country or company an edge in selling its goods at a reasonable lower price when compared with that of its competitors.
In this case, it is summarized or concluded that, Italy has a lower opportunity cost of producing shoes. So, Italy has a comparative advantage in shoes and Sweden has a comparative advantage in fish.
Answer:
Share your vision with them. Let employees know our plans for your company and your products and services. ...
Keep them in the loop. ...
Involve them in the launch of new products. ...
Reward them for building relationships with customers.
Explanation:
Answer:
$0.45
Explanation:
Given that
Desired lot size = 60
Annual demand = 40000
Holding cost = 20 per unit
Daily production rate = 320
Workdays per year = 250
Recall that
S = (Q^2 H[1 - d/p])/ 2d
Where S = setup cost
D = annual demand
Q = order quality
P = daily production
Seeing that daily demand is not given. We find d
d = 40000/250 = 160
Therefore
S = [60^2 20( 1 - 60/320)] / 2 × 40000
S = 3600 20 ( -1.12)/ 80000
S = $0.45
Answer:
I managed workers of seven in the associate degree info Services department whose responsibilities enclosed delivering specifications and software package to internal purchasers. My role was that of PM or Project Manager, and my responsibilities enclosed one. guaranteeing every staffer was alert to their specific duties, 2. maintained the relevant timelines and ensured every team-member's deliverables arrived on time, 3. arranged, coordinated, and crystal rectifier conferences to debate current and approaching come, and 4. maintained knowledgeable and cozy social atmosphere for my workers.
One of the tougher problems I Janus-faced was after we employed a very bright developer whose my leader had W2'd in from the Asian nation. though he was very precocious in development of the cultural variations between his land and our mostly-female dev team quickly became telling. Sensing the growing hostility in my work cluster, and distinctive the problem, I quietly organized for the W2 worker to attend a cultural sensitivity coaching seminar (couching it as a necessary attend for all employees), and taking aside the pained parties and asking in a well-mannered way to figure with Maine on desegregation him. In the end, he came to a lot of embarrassed, apologized, and our team ran like mechanism thenceforth
