1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natima [27]
4 years ago
11

So many West Point graduates joined the Confederacy, the government contemplated d shutting it down. (0f 1,108 U.S. Army officer

s in 1860, only 270 resigned to join the Confederate Army. Of those 270, however, 184 were West Point graduates and were mostly middle to upper commanders with military experience... most notably, Robert E. Lee.) Despite so many highly trained military leaders, they still ended up losing. Why do you think that was? j
History
2 answers:
photoshop1234 [79]4 years ago
5 0

A war has proven to be a matter more complex than just armies fighting each other. In order to win a war you need several elements other than just military might. You need massive, overwhelming popular support, you need numerical superiority, you need a solid and robust industrial sector that can produce all the military and other related supplies to both the military and the civilian population in the home front, you need great leader with a special combination of vision, idealism and pragmatism, you need allies and you need the best technology you can have.

The South was deficient in many of these elements:

The Union had 27 million men in the Army against 7 million Southern army regulars. Unless you have weapons of mass destruction that allow you to eliminate the enemy’s surplus of men you are not going to be able to overcome such a massive difference or at least not that easily.

The defense of the Union enjoyed massive moral support grounded in solid moral principles: a rejection of slavery, the fact that the South attacked the North first and the defense of the America that the Founding Fathers had created. The South was utterly divided, rich planters with slaves fully supported the war effort but they only had money, not men and their black slaves were certainly not going to fight to maintain slavery. Southern poor yeoman farmers did not care about slavery and when their sons got conscripted and killed to fight for the riches of wealthy Southern slave planters and their crops were seized they either rebelled or helped union spies or southern deserters. Even the State of Virginia was divided, since the Western part of it refused to secede.

The North was heavily industrialized and was able to mass produce weapons and engines of all kinds in order to support the war effort. The South had barely any industry and was unable to import weapons massively enough to equal the Union’s firepower.

Lincoln was an admired leader of solid moral principles and impressive mental and interpersonal talents. He was able to keep the Union focused and united and motivated. Jefferson Davis was an autocratic, disrespected arriviste who did not command the same loyalty or devotion.

The North had allies like Canada and even Tsarist Russia to some extent and was able to ensure the other European powerful nations remained neutral. The South was completely isolated with the exception of Britain that did try to help them a bit but British public opinion was massively against slavery and that prompted their government to stay out of the War. Monarchic France was also somewhat sympathetic to the South but was more concerned about their imperial plans in Mexico.

Because the South had invested little in education and research, the North surpassed it easily in that as well.

They did have most of West Point graduates, but only Lee was a remarkable general. They did have less soldiers but very motivated ones. They were able to put up a great fight and for two years they kept winning. But the Union persisted and they could only prevail. The South was never going to win.


Nikolay [14]4 years ago
5 0

I think that the Confederacy ended up losing because of multiple factors.

While the army had many West Point graduates as middle to upper commanders, their army suffered from shortages of soldiers due to casualties and lack of military experience.

On the other hand, the Union was able to attack the economy of the Confederacy by blocking the main ports in the South.

The inferiority of the army in numbers and technology, as well as the economic and international blockade were factors that the presence of West Point graduates in command could not compensate.

You might be interested in
How were the conditions under which early civilizations developed in Asia and Africa different from those of the Americas?
mario62 [17]

Early civilizations were ancient and did not have great technologies and the knowledge and help the early colonists of the Americas got from the Europeans.

 

Here are plenty of reasons that could justify referring to these civilizations as distinct from other peoples. What really distinguishes the Aztecs, the Mayans, the Apachee tribes and others, from the rest of the world, is that they were confined within an area that kept them from interacting with the Europeans, the Asians, and the Africans, and thus spreading their culture there. That led to the isolation of the people in the Americas, resulting to their civilizations being seemingly 'prehistoric'. What I mean by that is that they couldn't have access to materials that would in turn allow them to use more advanced technology. While they did have plenty of chocolate, there are other things that they definitely lacked, and as such we can see that their weapons were inadequate, and in comparison to those of the Europeans, they were petty. It's also noteworthy that there were no longer horses in the Americas, seeing as they had all died out. The first horse that arrived in the continent, after a long time, belonged to the Spanish armada. This is the most significant reason as to how the civilizations in America were different than those in the rest of the world. While I can name other reasons, such as distinctly different architecture, different cuisine, way of life, etc., these are not as noteworthy as the previous reasons that I named.

<span> </span>

8 0
3 years ago
What are the reasons soldiers enlisted​
Tems11 [23]

to serve their country? to have money? this is a blanket question i can try to answer it if you give me more detail.

4 0
4 years ago
When the north vietnamese took over saigon, how did the south vietnamese react?
Yuri [45]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was was part of henry iv's solution to bring peace
mars1129 [50]
Henry IV's solution to bring peace and unity to France was to convert to Catholicism to prove to the French that he was serious about pacification. 
6 0
4 years ago
How did Walt Disney influence the world?​
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

Walt Disney revolutionized the entertainment industry by creating films, theme parks, and characters such as Mickey Mouse. Walt Disney not only changed the entertainment industry; he also created a family friendly place known as Disneyland. Walt Disney took risks and introduced a completely different way of entertainment

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • The most successful mormon settlements were in what state
    8·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer. Why did some people want to reform the Catholic Church in the 1400s? A. They believed that the church
    12·1 answer
  • A policy that tries to avoid foreign alliances and involvement is called A) imperialism. B) isolationism. C) nationalism. D) res
    7·2 answers
  • Why did the Articles of Confederation result in a weak national government?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following amendments prohibited denial of the right to vote because of race, but not gender?
    12·1 answer
  • The following quotes relate to different aspects of the Columbian Exchange. They discuss the impact of the exchange on indigenou
    6·1 answer
  • Please help me asap!!!!!!<br> The greatest acheivement of the antifenderalist was to?
    10·1 answer
  • Whats something that should be invented? any ideas?
    9·2 answers
  • What limitations exist on freedom of speech?
    6·2 answers
  • During the berlin crisis, both the united states and the soviet union feared that the other side would.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!