Reasons why the school system is failing us can be for multiple reasons. For starters, people say we don't learn about important things needed to succeed after life in the secondary schools as we should. Do we know how to file taxes? Sew? Know what a deductible is in insurances?
Another example I'd think is the way we are integrating technology into schools. I do think that the school system is nice that they are implementing something such COMMON in our lives, but starting off with technology so early on can only lead to circumstances later on.
These are quite examples and many reasonings can be used to answer this question.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I am almost 100% sure its A, it's been awhile since I've had a class on this.
Honestly i just click on all of them, like the comments and stuff, some go away but if they are like having a conversation in the comments you’ll keep getting notifications for it. But yea I wish they would make a way to clear the notifications my ocd can’t take it lol
The Robison’s characters are known to be people who are faced with a lot of issues such as depression. They are calm, Complacent and are not Supercilious unlike the Fitzgerald characters which are known to be Supercilious and are rich hedonist.
<h3>What are the characters about?</h3>
“Robinson Crusoe” is regarded as a static and character that was not liked. He was a person that did not have any signs of personal growth and as such he was said to have faced a lot of hardships which he had endured. Crusoe in the book is seen as racist and self centered man.
Scott Fitzgerald characters shows a sense of feeling, energy, and also a lot of emotion in all of their story and they were known to be rich hedonist.
Therefore, The Robison’s characters are known to be people who are faced with a lot of issues such as depression. They are calm, Complacent and are not Supercilious unlike the Fitzgerald characters which are known to be Supercilious and are rich hedonist.
Learn more about characters from
brainly.com/question/8864308
#SPJ1
D would be best for his argument. At present, he has a lot of statements, but no sources. While his premises are well grounded and logical, we're still having to take his word for it. Having citations lends credibility to his work.
