Answer: your answer would be D
Explanation:
Incomplete/unclear question. The correct question read;
<u>88% </u>of all Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend. P2: Booze-Head is a Rutgers/Newark student. Can it be inductively concluded that Booze-Head will not get drunk this weekend?
Answer:
<u>No</u>
Explanation:
<em>Remember,</em> inductive reasoning is often based on<u> broad generalizations from specific observations.</u>
So since from this scenario, a broad generalization was made that <u>88% </u>of Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend, it seems <u>unlikely </u>and illogical that Booze will not be among those getting drunk on the weekend.
Answer:
statistically significant
Explanation:
Statistically significant: In statistics, the term "statistically significant" is described as a result that doesn't attribute to any chance. Significantly, it refers to the process that states if a "null hypothesis" is being true i.e, no difference exists then there's a very low chance or probability of obtaining or getting a large or a larger result.
In the question above, the given statement represents a statistically significant result.
Answer:
This is an example of a patriarchal society. Women had no freedom at the time and still are not treated equally. They could not hold a job besides being a housewife andd taking care of the kids. They could not leave the house. Women are still not treated the same and are payed less. They are considered a minority. Hope this helps!
Explanation: