Answer:
magine a social or personal change that hasn’t happened yet, but you would like to see the change happen in the future. The change can be something that you want to happen in your life or that you'd like to see happen in society. Is it a change that you think you could actively pursue, or do you think you would be more of a bystander?
Explanation:
When planning an argument you would choose what position of the argument you stand with so your answer is POSITION
The author's viewpoint in <em>"The Iroquois Confederacy" </em>was simply to state that:
- C. The Iroquois Confederacy instituted an effective democratic system.
Based on the complete text, we can see that there is a narration about the Iroquois Confederacy and how the rules stated there guided the tribes as the body of laws which guided them were called Gayanashagowa (Great Law of Peace).
With this in mind, we can see that the author's viewpoint was about how the Iroquois Confederacy was instituted as an effective democratic system.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C
Read more about Iroquois Confederacy here:
brainly.com/question/8756278
Answer:
cultural capital
Explanation:
Marty's siblings judge Lesly because, according to the term used by Bourdieu, she has no cultural capital, therefore she does not have the same education or knowledge as they do because of class differences. Because of this contrast, they considered themselves superior to her, and not pleased with the future marriage
The Kant's Critique of Pure Reason outlines the doctrine that states knowledge occurs through pure reason.
<h3>What does
Critique of Pure Reason explains?</h3>
The Critique describes how a priori knowledge is provided by pure reason and how knowledge is provided by a transcendental unity of reason and experience.
Hence, the Kant's Critique of Pure Reason outlines the doctrine that states knowledge occurs through pure reason.
Read more about Pure Reason
<em>brainly.com/question/61301</em>
#SPJ1
