Answer:
it pushes companies to seek to eliminate competition
Explanation:
apex
Answer:
D. Will the Jury award be worth it?
Explanation:
Jones asking himself if whistle blowing is the only way to stop unethical behavior and wrong doing before making decision whether or not to whistleblow is important, as if there are alternative measures to be taken that would mitigate those actions, it might be better to take those alternatives.
Same thing with whether he has documentary evidence to back up his accusatory statements and the reason for whistleblowing.
But the one thing that shouldn't have bearing on his decision is if the Jury award would be worth it. Whether or not there's an award for whistleblowing shouldn't be the determinant or driving factor that decides whether or not he should whistleblow. Its unethical to consider the monetary aspect or award gotten from whistleblowing.
In
hypothesis testing, one can only positively prove something by disproving the
null hypothesis. I this case, the null hypothesis is that there is no
relationship between eating frozen pizza and dangerous cholesterol levels.
<span> A p
value of a statistical summary (such as the sample mean difference between two
compared groups) indicates the probability that the null hypothesis is true.
Generally, a p value < 0.05 is usually taken to be statistically
significant, i.e. a 5% chance that the null hypothesis is true. In this case,
the relationship was find to be non-significant.</span>
Answer:
joint venture is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
Option E.
Explanation:
In free trade, a country with a comparative advantage in a good produces that good in the long-term. Therefore, if these people are working in an industry in which it has a higher opportunity cost i.e. it does not have a comparative advantage; they will eventually see job loss or fall in income or both. On other hand, when they purchase goods which has lower opportunity costs in foreign, they get access to these at a lower price and can purchase a higher quantity. So, these people are both harmed and benefitted by free trade.
