Answer:
On the northern United States and southeast Canadian seaboards
hello there
Andrea's point is probably the answer you're looking for, however, you should keep in mind that many (most?) environmental laws are driven more by politics than by the available data. Scientists do research on any number of topics (environmental or not) that have implications for our society. We (scientists) like to think that policy makers take our data and results into consideration when drafting legislation, but I would say that in my experience this rarely happens. For one, there have rarely been any federal legislators who understand science. Even the few physicians who've gone into politics seem largely to fail to understand very basic tenets of science, or at least they don't often demonstrate it with their political actions. Leaving environmental issues, for example, if politicians took science into account, there would be no discussion in any school district in the country about whether or not evolution should be taught in schools, as there are simply *NO* scientists who are qualified to have an opinion who would suggest it shouldn't. Environmental issues are not really any different.
hope that helped bye
Answer: I believe it is mudflows
Explanation:
Answer:
Today the world's population is 7.5 billion. The world's population is changing because of the natural increase rate. The natural increase rate is the crude birth rate minus the crude death rate. Since the crude birth rate is higher than the crude death rate today, this would lead to a higher natural increase rate.
Explanation:
