Answer:
D
Explanation:
An academic style should be formal, respectful, and objective. This means that the revision should be written well with correct grammar and not written like it is to a friend. The letter should also be kind to the recipient, especially because a favor is being asked of them. Also, subjective opinions should be left out of the writing.
1) So the first answer is incorrect because it demands that the senator comes. This is disrespectful and not fit for the intended tone.
2) The second answer is also wrong because of the first sentence. It is informal. The writer should not "check and see" if they are free because it is a colloquial way of asking for someone's time.
3) Finally, the third answer is incorrect because the food is described subjectively and informally. "Vittles" and "to boot" are formal and show the author's opinion.
4) D is correct because it maintains the same academic style through the writing.
Answer:
Explanation:
We had been on the road for six hours, but it felt like sixty given the appalling surface.
I was now worried that we wouldn’t arrive before nightfall, and my fears weren’t helped by the driver’s eccentric behaviour.
All I could find was these two. There were other complex sentences, but that was not what you were asking about. A compound sentence is one that has two parts that stand alone.
Answer:
When they spot the huge terrifying dinosaur, though, Eckels panics, inadvertently stepping off the path and crushing a single butterfly. That tiny difference is enough to unloose a chain of events so that by the time they get back to the future, it is irreparably changed.
Explanation:
Answer:
Can you put the questions so we can maybe try to answer it?
You should not give other people your info for the website
There is a slight error in the title of this question :)
Instead of ‘if my dad would let me’, it’s ‘had my dad let me (remember this useful phrase ending). This is because you can’t have a double ‘would’ in the same phrase.